If Codeberg is trying to "compete" against GitHub and GitLab, why does it refuse to take a look at AI assistants? Apart from infringing on authors' rights and questionable output quality, we think that the current hype wave led by major companies will leave a climate disaster in its wake: https://disconnect.blog/generative-ai-is-a-climate-disaster/

Other _sustainable_ (and cheaper!) ways for increasing efficiency in software development exist: In-project communication, powerful automation pipelines and reducing boilerplate.

Generative AI is a climate disaster

Tech companies are abandoning emissions pledges to chase AI market share

Disconnect
@Codeberg The biggest "competitive advantage" is *not having* unwanted AI garbage all over the place, not mining your users' code to offer to others as plagiarism material.
@Codeberg More broadly, I see "not trying to be an IDE"/not trying to be "VS code web edition" as a huge competitive advantage. GitHub completely broke their UI for actual use (reading code, studying history, researching bugs) by making it into an awful klunky editor that's completely unusable on mobile.
@dalias @Codeberg the back button on PRs broke within a week of the microsoft buyout
@hipsterelectron @Codeberg The back button on GitHub is broken all over. Sometimes it does stuff like taking you back 2 pages but URL bar only back one, or vice versa.