Cop described Sonya Massey shooting as ‘self-inflicted’ in initial dispatch

https://lemmy.world/post/17959849

Cop described Sonya Massey shooting as ‘self-inflicted’ in initial dispatch - Lemmy.World

‘Just to confirm: self-inflicted?’ a police dispatcher asks, to which a voice replies, ‘Self-inflicted’ After fatally shooting an unarmed Black woman [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/illinois-deputy-charged-sonya-massey-shooting-b2582792.html] who called 911 to report what she thought was a prowler outside her Illinois home, police claimed her death was in fact self-inflicted, according to the victim’s family and dispatch audio from the incident. Police at first told hospital staff that Sonya Massey, 36, had died by suicide, Jimmie Crawford Jr., the father of Massey’s daughter, said Tuesday at a press conference organized by civil rights attorney Ben Crump. At the same time, officers told Crawford that a neighbor had been responsible for Massey’s killing, he said. Massey’s son said police told him that his mother “had been shot in the eye and it came out her neck.” “They didn’t tell me who,” Malachi Hill Massey, 17, said on Tuesday. “They were just saying [it was] ‘somebody.’”

“Yeah, I’m good,” Grayson responds. “… You know, what else could we do? I’m not taking hot, boiling water to the f*****g face.”

I hope this scumbag is raped in prison before being stabbed and left to bleed out like a fucking pig by his celly

I’ve been to prison. You’re wrong to wish such torture upon anyone for any reason, no matter what they’ve done.

You want him dead? Then give him a quick and merciful death. That’s punishment enough.

I’m gonna go ahead and disagree. A quick death is too good for some people.
You should be raped and stabbed until you understand why you’re wrong.

Hold up…

You’re wrong to wish such torture upon anyone for any reason, no matter what they’ve done.

You should be raped and stabbed until you understand why you’re wrong.

Why not apply the idiots means to the idiot?

Because they’re still someone. You can’t take a hard line moralist approach and abandon it as soon as it’s inconvenient.

No one should suffer these things, not the vilest of criminals, or the idiots who think they should.

I’m not saying I agree with him, but this is the parafox of tolerance. If you tolerate the intolerant, intolerance wins out and the tolerant are eliminated.
This is absolutely not equivalent to the paradox of intolerance. Taking the stance of “you’re wrong to wish such torture upon anyone for any reason” almost immediately before wishing such torture upon someone is, by even the most generous interpretation, blatant hypocrisy.

I mean the paradox basically states if you want to stay a tolerant society you should be intolerant to the intolerant, which is a paradox.

And here’s a man claiming to be tolerant, being intolerant to an intolerant person.

And yes his statement is indeed hypocritical: “noone should suffer this except you”. But you know… the tolerant society being intolerant is also hypocrisy.