Sovcit is sooooo close..

https://lemmy.world/post/17632951

Sovcit is sooooo close.. - Lemmy.World

My econ 101 professor once said “what are the things that even the most anti-government people say the government needs to do? Emergency services.” Then these dense motherfuckers came along to outdo even that.
Internet libertarians & off-the-rails conservatives unironically say EMS and Fire Departments should be private. Ancaps go one step further and say police and sometimes even military should be private. It makes me lose hope in voters, until I remember that I was 15 before too and most people surely grow out of that phase. But there’s a few people who are fully adult-aged who still believe that which is kind of sad for them I guess

It makes me lose hope in voters, until I remember that I was 15 before too and most people surely grow out of that phase.

Wait till you turn 25 and leave your parents’ basement

Damn I didn’t know ancaps existed on this site

You’re the one who wrote about being 15.

You are most likely not able to reason why ancap ideology is bad or why your own ideology is good. Which is why you should show more respect to people who are trying to reason in either direction. Their opinion, no matter which direction specifically that is, is worth something.

Specifically ancap ideology is attractive for me exactly because it requires one to imagine very specific architectures of how things would work, so - to reason their position. I’ve been following one ancom channel in TG, because they were posting many interesting articles about tackling the same problems ancaps want to tackle. And as you may know, ancaps and ancoms don’t like each other.

Both ancap and ancom ideologies are simply better than all the rest, because they don’t ignore the problem of compromised institutions.

Once again, your opinion is worth as much as you personally can support it with logic. Being part of a crowd doesn’t mean attaining the intelligence or the authority of somebody else in that crowd. These things don’t transfer. So your tone makes only you personally look immature and stupid.

Both ancap and ancom ideologies are simply better than all the rest, because they don’t ignore the problem of compromised institutions.

And yet almost no one wants to live in the world those people have presented to everyone. Should they be forced to?

Should they be forced to?

If I can be forced to live in the world you like more, then yes, otherwise no.

I see, so how would you force them to live this way, kill the ones who elect a leader and decide to trade in currency?
Just kill those trying to prevent ancap between me and my friends.

You just said everyone should be forced to live in an ancap world.

Which is it? Just you and your friends or everyone?

What I said.

If I can be forced to live in the world you like more, then yes, otherwise no.

That’s why leftists fail at everything they do.

Which is it? Just you and your friends or everyone?

It’s not the first time you cheat to pretend you caught me at something.

Yes, I know that’s what you said.

I asked you:

And yet almost no one wants to live in the world those people have presented to everyone. Should they be forced to?

You responded:

If I can be forced to live in the world you like more

Clearly you can be forced to live in that world because you are forced to live in that world.

then yes

So I asked you how you would force everyone to live like that and you suddenly turned around and said this wasn’t about everyone, just you and your friends.

And I’m cheating somehow?

I think learning functional programming would do you good, and also I have a headache so leaving.
My entire job is using Scala, Rust, and Haskell, and I can guarantee that you have no fuckin idea what you’re on about

My entire job is using Scala, Rust, and Haskell, and I can guarantee that you have no fuckin idea what you’re on about.

Thank God you’re not my colleague with such guarantees.

I meant laziness, yes.

Did you just want to sound intellectual by using a random math term?

Before whom, someone like you?

You “meant laziness”? What are you trying to pull out of your ass right now man?
Yes, quite a lot of them, but I forget things as quickly as I learn them. Go away, you are a fool.

LOL no fuckin way you ever learned “quite a lot of them” (not even a logical response/conclusion following the comment) and then “forgot” everything about functional programming, but randomly spoutted it because it was somehow relevant. You don’t know what you’re talking about and it shows. And you’re crying “other people think they’re intelligent”… do you have no self-awareness? How do you rationalize that you get a pass for saying and believing stupid shit, “I know I’m right and they’re wrong, science and logic says otherwise but I know that means logic is just liberal propoganda! Grrr!”

Let me guess, you coded a shitty notepad in Python one time or vaguely heard some people on r/ProgrammerHumor mention C++ pointers and think you’re a “master hacker” now. Lmao

Well, I didn’t see which exact insult you wrote to be deleted by mods (I value their support emotionally, but frankly would prefer to replace all “deleted by mod” cases with “hidden by mod” to see what’s been posted if I want), but laziness in functional programming is not limited to lazy iterators. I meant lazy evaluations, as in Lisp. If that still doesn’t make sense to you, please postpone answering by 8-10 hours.

Actually the lemmy.world URL blacklist malfunctioned and banned a bunch of users. I’m glad that you thought it was a permanent ban though and that I wouldn’t be able to respond because now I can point and laugh at what you just said

but laziness in functional programming is not limited to lazy iterators. I meant lazy evaluations, as in Lisp.

Man you really just fucking Googled “laziness programming definition” and regurgitated words from the first Wikipedia article you saw? I’m curious how you’re going to try to weasel your way of of that and somehow connect lazy evaluation to whoever you were responding to that person. Because if you actually knew what the hell lazy evaluation was then you would know how stupid you sound right now.

Man you really just fucking Googled “laziness programming definition” and regurgitated words from the first Wikipedia article you saw?

In my language what I said looked fine in this context and I’d be understood. In your language it’s still fine because a person arguing in good faith starts with assuming that the problem is with them, and the rest are not worth worries.

Since I well know what lazy evaluations are, I am using them correctly, for the analogy that another person should have separated two arguments I’ve made.

So it is clear for any spectator, competent or not, that you are a fool. Except some of them are the same.

I didn’t “think it was a long ban”, I thought the specific comment got removed for some reason and I asked you to postpone continuation for 8-10 hours because I’d rather not test my willpower to not argue with fools in that timespan.

I also think you are incompetent at your job, because people use informal language all the time to talk about concepts.

In my language what I said looked fine in this context and I’d be understood.

Haha no fucking way you’re trying to use “in my language it’s different” in this context. What language? What language could you possibly even be referring to? Is this language in the room with us right now?

Since I well know what lazy evaluations are, I am using them correctly, for the analogy that another person should have separated two arguments I’ve made. So it is clear for any spectator, competent or not, that you are a fool. Except some of them are the same.

You saying “I’m right and your wrong because… because I know I’m right!” is certainly an argument. I guess I was correct about you not being able to come up with actual reasoning for the bullshit you tried pulling.

I also think you are incompetent at your job, because people use informal language all the time to talk about concepts.

What kind of pseudointellectual oral diarrhea is this? “Informal language”? You think anyone actually believes the bullshit you’re making up about “lazy evaluation” being “informal language” for something else in your language?

Are you in 10th grade or something? You sound so unbelievably dumb right now trying to make justifications for your stupidity up on the fly and failing horribly.

I’ve made some benevolent edits to that comment, but I think I should have just said “bye, fool”.

Bye, fool.

“I realize me trying to use terms I don’t know the meaning of in an argument makes me look stupid now to people who actually have knowledge about the subject, so I’m going to make a short and quippy comment and hope the other person lets me have the last word, or else I’m going to continue arguing because it would hurt my ego if they got to have the last word.” Ancaps are very predictable. How many times have you tried to mic drop people today so far?
You should have taken the L and stopped, many comments ago.
There are no L’s in arguments. Another fool blocked.
This entire chain could be posted here - insane person on lemmy