Tech Giants Withholding Products Because EU Regulation like GDPR
Tech Giants Withholding Products Because EU Regulation like GDPR
Corpo propaganda at it again...
I
Thanks for taking my joke literally and showing me a new search engine. That Google one seems pretty good. I’ve been using AltaVista and my BBS to find info but that’s way quicker.
Also, if you want to be a smart ass about it, use letmegooglethat.com/?q=dikfore
Also, if you want to be a smart ass about it, use letmegooglethat.com/?q=dikfore
There’s really no reason for you to be rude.
Other countries have a similar system. Canada for example has the Start-up Visa, which requires about C$225k investment, or the Quebec one (now suspended) which required C$1.25m over five years.
From what I can tell, the Hungarian requires somewhere between 200 and 300k EUR. This is not something that is affordable or easy to attain for the average lemmy poster. But again, this also does not guarantee citizenship, just residency.
Sounds like it’s working to me.
Zuckbot, comply with GDPR or forget about EU.
If we’re really lucky, those replacements might even become competition for the original products outside the EU, and drive the data vultures out of business.
(Something has to go right in this timeline eventually, right?)
This is more bark than bite, imo. They’re just threatening to withhold products at this point, but as the article points out:
So… go right ahead. Let’s see how this really plays out.
Does this mean we dont get to be tracked, data mined, ad-bombed, and exploited while our teens dont get depressed and sick from “social” media?
Nah you still get all of that but in a shitter product.
“Meta has decided not to release a new multimodal AI model and related products in the EU.
The move follows a similar decision last month by Apple to withhold its new Apple Intelligence features from Europe.”
Oh no. Wait. Come back.
Apple reversed log standing design policy to put a USB C charger in the iPhone because not selling iPhones in Europe was not a financially viable option.
Apple won’t launch their AI features in Europe because changing to comply with regulations is too hard
These features aren’t that important then I guess?
This is a total win for Europeans.
Bring more Europe to the US. Lol
This escalation will continue,
until big-tech forces the governments to kneel to the surveillance-capitalism biggest:
They will simply say something like:
“Either your government removes laws, regulations, accountability, etc, from us,
XOR we are hamstringing your country: we OWN you, we POSSESS you, & you will obey OUR rule.”
I guarantee this will be happening between now & 2036.
Remember how they can ratchet-up a genocide, anywhere??
They’ve already done so, in some places…
( Facebook & … was it Myanmar? as 1 example )
_ /\ _
until big-tech forces the governments to kneel to the surveillance-capitalism biggest:
You think governments are resisting?
Do you know what an optocoupler is? It’s when there’s no thermal or electric connection between parts, but the information gets transferred.
This is the same. Government officials don’t have to officially communicate with businesses in corrupt ways or allow such “revolving doors”.
They may communicate, well, face-to-face unofficially, get kickbacks.
And they also can do things mutually interesting for the business and the official without ever communicating about it, the economic interest is that communication in itself.
And then economic interests are just a subset of power interests. Like surveillance.
Oh… no… please… do not do that…
Anyways
Nice! Thank you EU for the GDPR!
For the next step, please let the companies that produce software be held accountable for damages. For Nonprofits change the target to associated companies. Also punish the people responsible, like the developers, for their software and choice of used libraries. If the library was insufficiently supported by the developer, then the developer has no ground to sue for damages themselves.
Also punish the people responsible, like the developers, for their software and choice of used libraries.
What??
You write shitty code and it breaks something? You should be punished accordingly.
You load libraries without checking each and every one and now something’s broken? You should be punished accordingly.
You load proprietary code and now something’s broken? You better checked the whole contract so you can punish the creators after you’ve been punished.
Software developers often have way more reach (over distance and over time) than they realize. They should be held accountable more like doctors or engineers.