It mildly terrifies me that a lot of things we think are natural are just things that were invented by American advertising agencies in the 40s and 50s

The nuclear family, diamond engagement rings, owning a motor car, etc are all works of fiction that we have subsumed into being part of our culture, instead of it being astroturfed by a bunch of skilled marketers

Even the idea of a woman being a homemaker while her husband goes out to work is, in itself, a fiction. That never happened. Women have been working for hundreds of years, but only in dirty jobs. The only women who could be homemakers were those whose husbands were wealthy and worked in the service economy… And therefore able to purchase microwaves and washing machines!

@yassie_j

This fiction also depends highly on the decade (speaking for the last century):

Every time there aren't enough workers, women are told that they can also "do their part" (work in a factory).

And every time there are too many workers, women are told that they belong in the kitchen.

@yassie_j My wife's a home maker right now. I will tell her she's fiction.

Okay, I told her she's fiction; this was her reply:

"That's erasure of me and my choices as a woman; who would say that?"

Which I think is hilarious.

@havoc I am trying so desperately to find out who asked

@yassie_j I mean you stated it:
"Even the idea of a woman being a homemaker while her husband goes out to work is, in itself, a fiction. "

So I wanted to tell my wife she was fictional because I thought it would be a gas. Her response was... cutting, to put it mildly.

@havoc you missed the point spectacularly, go read Yas's post a couple more times my guy

@cobweb Oh no, I get it, I just think a lot of that shit rocks.

The nuclear family where you can all afford to live on one salary? That kicks ass. The car? Freedom to go anywhere? That's an easy sell, it wasn't dastardly marketers.

And the whole point about home making wasn't very solid at all - lots of people choose it because it's fucking great.

@havoc that's the myth though, lots of people didn't choose it because they could not. The 50s and 60s homemaker is literally a media concoction.

@cobweb You have multiple people in the thread saying that they're not rich and that they choose it.

Wouldn't that make it... not a media concoction?

@havoc the plural of anecdote is not data.
@cobweb This is a wonderful point; does it suffice for shitposting on Mastodon?

@cobweb @havoc thank you, this is exactly what my post is about

Some people seem to believe that “well, I didn’t experience it, so it must not be true!!”

@yassie_j @cobweb If it's a choice and people who are not rich are doing it...

What's stopping anyone else?

@havoc @cobweb who cares?

@yassie_j @cobweb I mean, you're the one making the point that people are claiming it doesn't exist.

Multiple people say they're doing it just fine, and that it's a choice.

I guess in a deeper way none of this matters, it's just what we're talking about online. I don't see a deeper meaning to any of it; I had no broader point.

@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb can someone working a minimum wage job do it?

@Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb

That's the thing I think would save Capitalism, actually. Every full-time job should be able to function as the head of a traditional household.

I think the animosity and political division we have today is because workers do not have a large enough slice of the pie.

Minimum wage workers are the lowest paid 1% of workers. I guess it only works for the 99% of the rest of workers.

@havoc @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j why does capitalism need saving? Every full time job could be able to support a family of any type, not just nuclear family, if we would just leave it behind
@cobweb @havoc @yassie_j it's a wild take, isn't it? "If we change this fundamental principle it might be ok"

@cobweb @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j
Something like 55% of Americans own their homes. It seems to be working for quite a number of people?

I'd rather get that percentage even higher, but... is the system all bad as is? It seems to be working for a lot of people.

@havoc @cobweb @yassie_j the actual figure is 65%. However this is not a useful statistic as it lumps people who own outright in with people who are paying down hundreds of thousands of debt.

That is ignoring the fact that home ownership is not a good heuristic for quality of life. How many of those "owners" are one car accident away from losing everything?
@Len0w0ThinkBad @havoc @cobweb @yassie_j > That is ignoring the fact that home ownership is not a good heuristic for quality of life. How many of those "owners" are one car accident away from losing everything?

Considering the availability of medical care, they might well be one bad fall in a stairway away from eating their gun.
@Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb @havoc And since when is "65% of people might have autonomy to do what they want in their own home" a convincing argument for capitalism..?
@girlmaya @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb There's a convincing number of people who are making the system work for them; I haven't seen an alternate system that would cover as many bases with as much freedom and as many people having nice lives.

@girlmaya @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb For instance, I think people want "communal ownership" but they do not want to do "communal work".

For example, if you are permanently jobless, it's tough to take your position seriously about communal property if you're already unwilling to work.

There are tons of worker collectives out there. It's not illegal to form one; it's even encouraged. It hasn't taken the world by storm though...

@havoc @girlmaya @yassie_j @cobweb Please remove my handle from this thread.
@girlmaya @yassie_j @cobweb O sorry thought that was automatic after you mute a thread, my bad. I know you won't get this, but yea my bad.
@havoc @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb Have you considered not letting such a system restrict you at all? Have you considered real life?
@girlmaya @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb real life is constrained by the need to gather resources and allocate time, which is all these systems really are?
@havoc That's obviously not what "all these systems really are"

@girlmaya I suppose we should include "defense".

There will never be a self-organizing anarchistic state because it could never maintain a standing army of sufficient size. It's also why self-organizing principles fail beyond a certain size (what works for a commune, doesn't work for a polis, state, or country).

Or are we saying these things take on a kind of emergent life of their own, beyond the wishes and needs of their populace? Interesting either way, lemme know.

@havoc @girlmaya
@yassie_j a convincing number of people making the system work for them? Are you in the us? Because that sounds like you have blinders on. Have you considered that alternate systems are actively suppressed?

@cobweb @girlmaya @yassie_j They're so actively suppressed, we're discussing them openly, multiple books are written about them, TV shows, world-famous musicians frequently discuss them. Very samizdat!

Mondragon in Spain is the only relatively large worker cooperative (that does "real stuff" - not a cafe or book store...). A handful of small science/engineering shops.

If this was a worthwhile organizing principle, why does it fare so poorly? It's all external suppression?

@havoc @cobweb @Len0w0ThinkBad you know that life expectancy in the US has dropped, right? Like, in the last few years? Children are getting shorter (due to malnutrition), there are more people who are in precarious employment, and the ratio between earnings and house prices is multiple times worse than it was even a decade ago.

If a country where children are poorly fed, people are dying more often, and the national minimum wage hasn’t changed since the release of GTA V is “working for a lot of people” then you must be the most un-self-aware person in the USA.

@yassie_j @Len0w0ThinkBad @cobweb I do not think anybody in America actually cares what happens to anybody else; it explains our gun laws, car sizes, everything - as long as people can afford to buy a house and go on vacations, nobody cares.

I mean, the prison industrial complex? We just collectively look at that shit and shrug. Pretty horrifying.

@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb well, you are kind of embodying that attitude in your argument
@Len0w0ThinkBad @havoc @cobweb sometimes I wonder if network neutrality was a mistake
@yassie_j @Len0w0ThinkBad @cobweb Letting non-engineers/scientists on the internet was the mistake. September 1993.
@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb oh, you're one of those. Goodbye.

@havoc @Len0w0ThinkBad @cobweb lmaoooooo

Go back to using dial-up then, code monkey

@yassie_j @Len0w0ThinkBad @cobweb What? Things were seriously better before that.
@havoc @yassie_j @Len0w0ThinkBad lol what? No they were not, I was there haha
@havoc @cobweb @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j lol, dude, federated BBSes existed back then and you're communicating on a network that resembles them more than anything the Internet was used for.
@yassie_j @havoc @cobweb @Len0w0ThinkBad It was not, letting corposcum decide what you should be able to see is a bad idea.

As was allowing privatization of network infrastructure occur to start with of course.

The model of various nations where it is public infrastructure and ISPs merely do bookkeeping and allocation works better.
@Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb How so? I'm actively saying we need to bring more workers into the fold to have the same kind of success a huge percentage of people already do?
@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb so you agree than communal ownership of the means of production is necessary?

@Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb There are *already* worker cooperatives, in a number of industries and fields.

If it was a better organizing principle, wouldn't it have taken over by now?

There are some things that should be locally run and community owned - the power grid, last mile internet, etc. I'm hoping batteries allow us to disconnect from the grid; we've been less successful with wireless mesh networks though (sadly).

@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb I said goodbye, sir. Unsubscribe. I do not wish to receive further communication.
@Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j @cobweb Was it something I said? I apologize :(
@havoc @Len0w0ThinkBad @yassie_j what does it mean to you to bring workers into the fold?
@havoc @yassie_j @cobweb what does "not rich" mean? How much money do you get? Why isn't that "rich"?
@havoc @cobweb > Freedom to go anywhere?

Traffic, road presence, maintenance requirements, minimal income required to acquire & maintain the car and blockades not withstanding, of course.

Between all that, it didn't really have any advantage over rail. What the car did was take the cost of maintaining public infrastructure, and then essentially duplicate it so as to also charge private individuals for it.

It was a lot cheaper for a low-income worker to afford a train ticket to go wherever than a car. It was also more reliable and less subject to ridiculous delays.

@lispi314 @cobweb In Grapes of Wrath the poor family has a car.

Even in our classic stories of being ground down by the boot of Capitalism we're able to afford cars. Cars aren't that expensive.

@havoc @cobweb I don't think a fiction novel with a very specific drama story it wants to tell is a good idea to rely on as a historical reference.

They also very much didn't acquire that car /while/ they were poor.
@cobweb Will give you the diamond engagement ring being stupid tho, hard agree there.

@cobweb It's a poorly formed jumble of thoughts which includes (incidentally) the total erasure of women's choices.

I don't think I missed the point - I don't think it has valid one(s).

@havoc @cobweb "erasure of women's choices." the point was that for a lot of women pre women's suffrage this wasn't really a choice they could make themselves, and in particular it seems like in the United States at least we're reverting back to "We'll make the choices for you". I would also like to mention that in living with your wife in a house where one of you is the breadwinner is a luxury. The price of housing has gone up significantly, most married couples I know have both the wife and the husband working full time jobs. "Teaching" isn't just a job you slack on, that's still a significant amount of work. Another thing is that people with massive gaps in their resume are discriminated against, particularly if your wife has a 10+ year gap in her resume that's going to raise some questions to future employers. So... if you can't get a higher paying job because you don't have recent work history you're kinda pushed down to the bottom of the totem pole forced to make your way back up again.
@havoc @cobweb If that's something your wife likes to do that's great. It's heavily sexist propaganda that was pushed on a lot of people via advertisement of what life "should be". My mother does not tell my sister "you do not need to worry about school dear, just find a rich man to marry", my sister actually is encouraged to pursue what she is interested in (she wants to be a veterinarian). Look, I'm sure there are plenty of women (and men) who are in the homesteading life and who enjoy living a life of household chores, who are self sustaining. That's not a bad thing, but what is a bad thing is that predominately sexist stereotype of being a "home mom" taking care of the kids. It is everywhere in pop culture as well, look at something like the Jetsons (which, despite the fact they have a robot maid the mother is always at home curious). This is about not teaching young women that their only aspirations in life is to provide for a husband. It is about being as independent as a man with as many opportunities as a man regardless of if that's something they want, they should have the freedom to decide that for themselves. That's all this post was about. I don't know how you got so far off point.
@havoc @[email protected] Mastodon and its consequences have been a disaster for the Fediverse