Haha. I’m reading Sapiens right now, too

I’ve never actually read any Harari books for some reason. Is his stuff generally “reliable”?

r/askhistorians on reddit always rails about it being, paraphrasing: too cut and dry for such complicated topics. I’ve the first half of the first one, and I don’t disagree, but I’m not a historian. Reductionism is definitely in play, and there’s certainly a narrative bias in there for entertainment.

It seems about as reliable as Isaac Asimov’s essays (as published in The Road to Infinity, or similar).

Thanks. So, interesting and generally reliable, but claims should be treated with caution?

Yep.

When a historian complains that something is reductionist, I usually ask them “what is the temperature of the air in the room right now.” I don’t mind reductionism, particularly when ingesting materials from outside my field of expertise – because I don’t have time to become an expert in every field :)

I usually ask them “what is the temperature of the air in the room right now.”

What mean? I can’t brain good today