girlfreddyJun 28, 2024

Can Biden be replaced as Democrat nominee? Who could replace him?

https://lemmy.ca/post/24019849

Can Biden be replaced as Democrat nominee? Who could replace him? - Lemmy.ca

The first presidential debate is done and the aftermath has not been good for the incumbent, Joe Biden. Some Democrat politicians and operatives reportedly texted CNN commentators with hopes that Mr Biden, 81, would step aside. Some floated the possibility of going to the White House and publicly stating concerns about him remaining as candidate. But if Mr Biden were to drop out, it would be a free-for-all. There is no official mechanism for him or anyone else in the party to choose his successor, meaning Democrats would be left with an open (Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago from August 19-22.

Show threadgirlfreddyJun 28, 2024

I’d go for Bernie myself.

I mean just imagine that! In a year of some of the worst and craziest ‘first-time-evers’ Sanders could be the DNC’s candidate.

Show threadFlying SquidJun 28, 2024

You’d go for someone older than Biden?

I like Bernie, but that’s a ridiculous replacement.

Show thread𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍Jun 28, 2024

Once again, we agree.

Why always with the old white men, when we have prominent politicians like Yang, Buttigieg, Klobuchar? And as for Bernie, if you want a firebrand who’s going to alienate moderates, why not AOC? Well, she’s too young to run, but she’s not the only truly liberal option. Warren is old enough, progressive enough, and a woman. But, no, Bernie Bros gotta Bro.

Show threadFlying SquidJun 28, 2024
I’m honestly trying to think of who they could run this late and I’m coming up short. Gavin Newsom is terrible idea in my opinion. Like you said, AOC is too young. Kamala Harris? People hate her.
Show thread𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍Jun 28, 2024

Agreed, and agreed.

Why not Klobuchar? She’s got some national recognition from the 2019/20 cycle, politics are acceptable to moderates, progressive (enough), and she’d eat Trump for lunch in debates and on social media. Plus, she’s from the Midwest, and might pick up some folks for regional loyalty, and could play against the “slick New Yorker” which might still work.

The bases are going to vote party lines. I think undecideds and wavering moderates are the pick-up points, and I think Klobuchar could do that.

I like Yang’s politics, but he’s got a popularity problem, and Buttigieg - Trump would just harp on his sexual orientation, and I’m not confident enough that America’s ready yet to vote for a gay president. Hell, we can’t even get a woman into office.

IMO Klobuchar’s the safest bet against Trump.

Show threadFlying SquidJun 28, 2024
Klobuchar is definitely a good idea. Although I’m not convinced that replacing Biden this late in the game is going to save the presidency either. I don’t know what should be done.
Show thread𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍Jun 28, 2024

🙁 🤝

Lemmy really, really needs emoji responses that don’t require and entirely new comment.

Show threadcatloaf
You could just upvote it.
Jun 28, 2024 at 11:12pmWeb
Show thread𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍Jun 29, 2024

The problem is that upvotes serve two conflicting proposes. Upvoting raises visibility, so one use is to say, “this is a post people should see.” In that case, you may not necessarily agree with the content of the post, but rather believe it’s worthy of debate. A good example of this is c/unpopularopinion, where the community rules specifically state to upvote if you agree it’s an unpopular opinion, not whether you agree with the opinion.

The other, conflicting, use is to signal approval or disapproval.

You can’t do both at the same time. It’s a flaw in design Reddit had, which they fixed but monetized. Lemmy did not learn from Reddit’s mistake and instead repeated it.

Two conflicting uses for the same action is terrible UX design.