jeffwThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat
TimLovesTechThis is quid pro quo being ruled as NOT bribery because it comes to the person on the backside of the favor. This is almost certainly to do with the majority of the court recently being outed about the amount of high value bribes gifts/vacations they are getting from “friends”.
DominusOfMegadeus“We realized that people now knew the things we constantly do wrong, so we made them not wrong anymore.”
NegativeLookBehind“We’ve investigated ourselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing”
MaggotyThis is almost certainly to do with the majority of the court recently being outed about the amount of high value bribes gifts/vacations they are getting from “friends”.
Nah, this is a long running theme. In chronological order-
Sun Diamond Growers - The government must prove the bribe is actually connected to the act. Skilling - Corruption charges require a second party to give you a bribe or kickback, self dealing is fine. Citizens United - Money is political speech, and you can spend as much as you want on an election. McDonnell - Acting as a pay to play gatekeeper is fine. Even if the government connects the bribe to the act. Ted Cruz - Politicians can keep unspent campaign funds as long as they maintain the fiction of having lent the campaign money. Snyder - Kickbacks aren’t actionable. <- We are here.