I have been reflecting on this, and I can see there are reasons.

Over the last couple of years my #photography has become lot more focused, I have a fairly clear idea what I am after, all the way to the print, and I if don't think I can produce the print to my satisfaction I don't bother with taking the picture.

As a consequence, most of the photographs I take involve some degree of planning, I don't often take photographs on the first visit to a place, and even when I do, I usually anticipate wanting to come back; this means I typically have the option to bring a #LargeFormat camera (I understand what Adams meant when he said he brings the biggest camera could carry; he wasn't trying to be funny).

I have also developed a particular way of seeing landscapes that closely align with the LF — I have a strong preference for the 4x5 aspect in vertical orientation, and slightly longer focal lengths (mainly 210, i.e., ~70 eq.); this is awkward to reproduce with other cameras (35mm doesn't give me the negative quality I want for printing and I don't like the 3x2 ratio; 6x7 has the correct ratio, but the lack of movements at the corresponding focal lengths is a major problem).

There are undoubtedly good photographs I miss as a result, but for most of it, they aren't my photographs to take. But there are some circumstances when the LF camera is too awkward, to some degree to do with weight, but more with weather; I can manage wind or rain, but both at the same time are hard, I should probably make more use of my 645 and 6x7 cameras in those circumstances.