I just recently realized that what I truly hate about LLMs is that it devalues language. I love language, I love using it very intentionally, I love how different people wield and work language differently. A well forged phrase can cut right to the soul. Language is literally magic. It can do things where man and machine all fail.

But now with the press of a button you can get sugary pink language goo in any shape you like. And this is sold as an equal replacement to real human language. The insult! The depravity!

I think it might say something about how far language is already devalued. We live in a morass of content marketing and business process documentation and terms and conditions and propaganda and spam. All soulless language that nobody asks for but that people are compelled to create. We can't imagine not creating such language goo. And so we're grateful for the pink goo machine.

You know those stories about how there was once magic in the world but it was lost? This is it. This is how it happens.

@plexus I worry a bit that LLM can lead to a stagnation of language.

Blog posts, press articles,... etc. from 20 years ago sound a bit different than todays texts.
Press articles from 40 years ago sounds imho already a bit outdated.
Going back 60 years it becomes already quite noticable old fashioned with differences in the lexicon.

But if from now on a significant part of the press corpus becomes LLM generated, feeding only on itself, how can a language change over time anymore?