This is an EPIC rant and EVERY WORD OF IT IS TRUE. Seriously, set aside half an hour to read it! (Caution: contains expletives and LLMs.)
https://mastodon.sprawl.club/@ludicity/112641685611188242
Ludic 🧛 (@[email protected])

Great news everyone! I finally talk about AI hype. Someone finally mentioned LLMs one time too many, and the reckoning is upon us: https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/

Sprawl Club

@cstross

If your tastes run to (slightly) less profanity and (much) more academic peer review, then we got you covered:

MH Hicks, J Humphries, and J Slater, "ChatGPT is Bullshit", _Ethics and Info Tech_ 26:38, 2024-Jun-08.

Open Access: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5

It's in my queue for a blog post in the next couple days, but no harm in pointing out the source ahead of time!

ChatGPT is bullshit - Ethics and Information Technology

Recently, there has been considerable interest in large language models: machine learning systems which produce human-like text and dialogue. Applications of these systems have been plagued by persistent inaccuracies in their output; these are often called “AI hallucinations”. We argue that these falsehoods, and the overall activity of large language models, is better understood as bullshit in the sense explored by Frankfurt (On Bullshit, Princeton, 2005): the models are in an important way indifferent to the truth of their outputs. We distinguish two ways in which the models can be said to be bullshitters, and argue that they clearly meet at least one of these definitions. We further argue that describing AI misrepresentations as bullshit is both a more useful and more accurate way of predicting and discussing the behaviour of these systems.

SpringerLink