@ajd Send an RFC patch series with a lot of removed lines, see how many people start screaming, then calm them down with a promise that the driver is going to stay for a few more releases, but then it will be removed unless someone else steps up. 😉
@ajd The strategy behind it is that there is some discussion on the mailing list which will be noticed and reported by @kernellogger and maybe Phoronix, so even non-developers become aware.
@ptesarik@kernellogger haha that is definitely a strategy! though the driver I am looking at removing is pretty niche (specialised hardware that costs >$5000, basically all enterprise or academic users) and I suspect they're not going to find out via Phoronix!
@ajd@ptesarik@kernellogger Don't bet on how many people bought them on eBay 🙂 Anyway, I guess supposed to start with Documenation/process/deprecated.rst ? Then some distros would drop it from new releases.
@penguin42@kernellogger I believe @ajd asked about a “plan to remove it soon”. The official process takes four to five years, which I assumed was NOT soon.
@ptesarik@kernellogger@ajd Well there's no reason to rush to actually remove code; mark it deprecated and then laugh evilly at anyone who asks why it's broken.
@penguin42@kernellogger@ajd Good, then the deprecation process works fine. You may not even have to remove the code. If you're lucky, it will be deleted by @gregkh to solve a CVE.