Yeah, about that… - Sopuli

I remember seeing a lot of people expand their horizons on all kinds of topics when the internet first started catching on.

Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

Assuming that intelligence (and I don’t mean IQ or any other psychometric “proxy” for intelligence, but intelligence as an abstract trait) is normally distributed like most other traits, 50% of people are going to be dumber than average because in normal distributions the mean is the median.

And anyone trying to claim that intelligence as a concept is a completely socially constructed trait and that there is no difference in intelligence between people can shove it up their ass.

50% of people are going to be dumber than average because in normal distributions the mean is the median. The “general population” is not smart by any definition.

What if “smart” begins at the 35th percentile, rather than the 50th? What if “gifted” is anything above the 50th percentile?

What if “smart” begins at the 35th percentile, rather than the 50th?

That seems like an extremely unlikely scenario