Australia is facing a housing crisis characterised by high costs and insufficient supply relative to its population. Despite building more homes per 100,000 people than Canada, the US, and the UK, and dedicating a significant portion of its economy to housing construction, the sector employs around 1.35 million people. Yet, completion times are increasing due to poor supply chains, labor shortages, and low-quality construction. In New South Wales, half of the high-rise projects have significant defects.

The government aims to address this by focusing on the supply side, as outlined in the budget attachment "Statement 4: Meeting Australia’s Housing Challenge" from the Treasury. It acknowledges the housing shortage, emphasising that insufficient homes are being built in the right areas to meet community needs. The statement discusses the causes of the housing undersupply, its impact on affordability, and the necessary changes to accelerate housing supply.

According to the government, this undersupply is driving up rents, mortgage repayments, and house prices. However, while the government talks about solutions, the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen. A critical issue is the high levels of migration, which should be curtailed to align demand with long-term averages. Both sides of politics have mentioned this during budget discussions, but as highlighted in my recent show "The Migration Question Amplified; But Not Tackled… By Anyone!", it often ends up as mere rhetoric.

In reality, neither political side seems ready to address the issue seriously, despite its direct link to higher inflation. Consequently, we can expect prolonged higher inflation, necessitating higher interest rates than would otherwise be required.

#housingcrisis ##rentalcrisis #auspol #massimmigration #BetterNotBigger #inflation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuSgXsYUnRg

Peddling The Housing Supply Myth: Again…

YouTube

@mojo

Yes, but they all continue to avoid the most obvious one of all, landlords using tax concessions to make property ownership a profitable business without actually putting anything back - they don't build new homes, they profit from already existing.

Original landowners - often farmers on the fringe of cities, sell their properties to developers, usually under-priced, developers petition governments to divide land for residential, eventually gets re-assigned, developer divides, makes insane profit justifying it's model, actual builders move in and build.

It has nothing to do with tax concessions for existing landlords.

Reduce the concessions, they've well and truly had their fill at all our expense, it's pretty obvious what is going on.

Myth busted.

Edit: Yes, that's why these kinds of people panic when you bring up franking credits, because that is one of the methods they are using to reduce, or even in some cases totally avoid paying tax.

I see what you are doing - especially you, the "Liberal" Party of Australia, no wonder you all kicked up a stink about it awhile back, you would be hopeless poker players.

#auspol

@mojo

If you don't believe me, go to any major growth zone and you'll see it, large vacant pegged blocks of land, little crappy one room developer sales joints scattered around the place, and excavators slowly moving in digging the land up, it has nothing to do with existing rental land lords, which so often I hear a bunch of people in the standard media & even ignorant politicians say it does.

It doesn't, and never has, I've seen it (development) many times in my life, and it's always the same thing.