UK’s Sunak promises mandatory national service for 18-year-olds if elected [26 May 2024 | Al Jazeera]

https://lemmy.world/post/15826551

UK’s Sunak promises mandatory national service for 18-year-olds if elected [26 May 2024 | Al Jazeera] - Lemmy.World

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15826549 [https://lemmy.world/post/15826549] > >Ruling Conservative Party says it will bring back national service if it wins the July 4 general election. > > >Eighteen-year-olds will have to perform a mandatory national service if the Conservative Party is voted back to power in the United Kingdom’s July 4 election, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has announced. > > >The prime minister’s plan would entail young people being given a choice between a full-time placement in the armed forces for 12 months or spending one weekend a month for a year volunteering in their community, the party said.

Maybe I’m missing something. In fact I’m sure I am as I don’t follow UK politics closely at all. Mostly what I know is from scrolling past headlines like this one.

Confusing thing #1: My understanding is the Conservative (Tory?) party is struggling so the PM called for a “snap” election.

If you’re not doing great, wouldn’t it make more sense to try and weather the storm and work to make things sunnier before the next election rather than call for an election amidst the storm?

Confusing thing #2: If you are in said storm and now looking down the barrel of an election, wouldn’t that be the opposite of the time you would want to announce your unpopular policy ideas?

This really sounds like someone who is trying to get fired instead of quit.

So what am I missing?

The choice of policy ideas is weird but the strategy of snap elections can reinforce the party’s power until the next election if it goes well. It’s like squeezing your electorate for more power until the balance shifts in the other direction