https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-3163
@graham_knapp You missed the kicker?
> Both female and male patients had a lower patient mortality when treated by female physicians
@graham_knapp
Yes. It may also be true, that both outcomes, that men are worse doctors and men profit less, when treated by female doctors have the same cause: communication skills. Patients profit from the doctor's and their own communication skills.
Another possibility: Because men were seen more or less as standard model for human physiology for a long time, male physiology might me more common knowledge than female. So men would profit less from a doctor with superior knowledge.
@troy_s
@graham_knapp @mekkaokereke This is the second paper that pops up in my timeline today showing that women are more competent than men.
It makes you wonder...
(The first one was: https://floss.social/@Bo/112466304765070334)
Study on gender bias in Pull Request acceptance: "Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless." https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308716997_Gender_bias_in_open_source_Pull_request_acceptance_of_women_versus_men
@graham_knapp @mekkaokereke I don't have any literature at hand supporting this, but I think that in most STEM professions(*) (including medicine) there is a survivor bias, or a "join the club" bias, whatever this is actually called :), which is depressing and disappointing.
Depressing and disappointing is also the fact that in low-confidence situations, gender will be a strong factor
(*) this could be true also for other disciplines, I'm not just familiar with them
​