We may clown on him a lot but it's genuinely quite dystopian how much power Elon Musk has.
We may clown on him a lot but it's genuinely quite dystopian how much power Elon Musk has.
Me when I first read who the narrator was.
Third party candidates donāt typically siphon votes away from the party that religiously tows the line.
Trump doesnāt really tow the line, through. Heās a manifestation of a revolt from inside the GOPās white nationalist electoral core, against the financial internationalist who have controlled the party since Reagan.
I donāt think itās clear who RFK is really feeding from. Itās possible his voters simply wouldnāt turn out if he wasnāt on the ballot. But itās doubtful that he can steal Biden voters by parroting Trump positions.
The dems and the left will debate procedural shit for how to accomplish similar goals. The right is all emotional appeals/reactionaries.
Liberal admins donāt debate procedural shit, they kill legislation hostile to their donors with technicalities. These same technicalities never affect our illegal wars or unconstitutional policing or criminally unconscionable polluting or corrupt corporate bailouts.
The big difference between libs and cons is that cons demand their red meat and are willing to lose an election or two to guarantee it, while liberals are constantly running scared of their replacements in the next election.
The emotion you see isnāt unique to conservatives. Itās simply rewarded rather than shamed.
Trump doesnāt really tow the line though
No, but their voters would sacrifice themselves to tow the line. That was my point.
itās doubtful that he can steal Biden votes by parroting trump positions.
I dunno. There are plenty of relatively shallow thinking democrats. Itās called a āprotest voteā for a reason.
Liberal admins donāt debate procedural shit
I didnāt mean āprocedural shitā like inside baseball house floor procedural. I meant the voters are multifaceted and disagree on how to achieve what liberals and leftists can generally agree upon: social programs and the like. See what Iām saying? Iām really tired and Iām not explaining this well, but Iām saying even if leftists and liberals and democrats can all be somewhat on the same page about a general outcome theyād like to see, there are segments of that voting populace that would withhold their vote if the the issue is discussed in a way they canāt get behind or the route to the agreed-upon solution isnāt exactly to their liking.
There was a tweet someone posted just the other day on the leftist meme community, basically saying āfascists are leftistsā #2 greatest enemy, behind the other leftist who agrees with them roughly 96%.ā Youāll also get a lot more single issue voters, or leftists that will be turned away because they canāt sacrifice their morals on one issue the candidate doesnāt agree with them on, while undeniably accomplishing many things the leftist does support. We have principles, basically. And sacrificing those principles is a lot harder for us than a right wing voter that see Red and mashes that button as fast as they can.
The democratsā likely voters are finicky and incredibly diverse. On the right, the voters tow the line pretty much universally. No matter what happens, the republicans canāt seem to lose votes past a certain point. The democrats have to get a lot of stuff right for a pretty diverse group of voters, all in a row, to keep their voters turning out.
cons demand their red meat and are willing to lose an election or two to guarantee it.
If Iām understanding this correctly, I think I strongly disagree. But can you clarify this? Because Iām not sure I do actually understand what you mean.
Yeah, I think thatās generally the idea. But i think the same wouldāve been true of Gary whatshisface in 2016, the libertarian guy. Iām not really sure thatās how it shook out in the end, though.
I also think the more-likely-to-be-democrat voters are probably just generally more likely to vote third party, knowing itās a throwaway, in order to send a message. The right really doesnāt ever seem to break apart, that ~48-50% of people seemingly canāt be turned away no matter what happens. Look at all those street interviews done recently. Those āanyone but trumpā republicans, when pressed on who theyād vote for if Nikki Haley couldnāt win the primary, they all waffled for a minute before saying theyād vote for trump. After calling him a fascist, a racist, etc. The conditioning on the right is so strong. It needs to be studied. Iām sure it will be if humanity survives the next 20 years.
youtu.be/yRpWaJRyVQo?si=slyJXZqeUSYjT9Xm
Worth watching.
the rest are white supremacists
Sooo⦠the vast majority of the US political establishment?
Now, now, thereās no need for that kinda talk.
We should probably stick to talking about Rampart
im baffled that someone was seemingly notified for what is literally two paragraphs and a sentence.
What has the internet come to these days?
What is scary is how consistently cruel, apathetic and ignorant our plutocrats are, which is exactly why we gave up on monarchy in the first place.
It shows us how capitalism doesnāt work and just deteriorates to rule by force (but with more manufactured consent).
which is exactly why we gave up on monarchy
We didnāt give up on monarchy. We guillotined the fuck out of it.