ihatelinuxMay 14, 2024

OpenAgeRatingsService: why "sex-homosexuality"?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/19312532

OpenAgeRatingsService: why "sex-homosexuality"? - sh.itjust.works

I can understand why all the other things would be listed here, and I would understand if sexuality in general was considered inappropriate for children, but why homosexuality in particular? This is strange to me. <content_rating type="oars-1.1"> <content_attribute id="violence-cartoon">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-fantasy">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-realistic">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-bloodshed">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-sexual">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-desecration">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-slavery">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-worship">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-alcohol">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-narcotics">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-tobacco">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-nudity">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-themes">none</content_attribute> <!-- this line here --> <content_attribute id="sex-homosexuality">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-prostitution">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-adultery">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-appearance">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-profanity">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-humor">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-discrimination">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-chat">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-info">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-audio">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-location">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-contacts">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="money-purchasing">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="money-gambling">none</content_attribute> </content_rating>

Show thread520May 15, 2024
Because by law in certain countries, homosexuality is persona non grata, and a filter needs to be there to legally operate in such countries.
Show threadllamajester421May 15, 2024
Do these backward shepherds that stone their wives need computers?
Show threadPoliticalAgitatorMay 15, 2024
The Republican culture war being waged against the LGBT+ community should make it completely clear that your skin color or brand of religious nonsense doesn’t make you immune to bigotry.
Show threaddrwankingsteinMay 15, 2024

if the democrats would stop drumming up as much hatred as possible towards us it wouldn’t have become such a large issue in the first place, People feel like it is getting worse, because it is. People who never even cared about whether someone was gay or not now has a strong negative association towards us because democrats have the incessant need to shove it everywhere they go.

It’s no surprise that people are starting to hate gay folk when they get shit for so much as looking away when they see gay people kiss in public. The amount of time’s I’ve had to say “I’m not one of those gay people” is absurd.

Show threadFeathercrownMay 16, 2024

People who never even cared about whether someone was gay or not now has a strong negative association

Or they can be a big boy and suck it the fuck up

Show threaddrwankingstein
funny how this only ever works one way regardless of who you talk to.
May 16, 2024 at 7:29amWeb
Show threadFeathercrownMay 16, 2024
I’d like to think I apply it fairly, although note that there’s a difference between “those people were mean, stop feeling sad” and “those people were mean, but you still have to treat them like they’re humans.”