OpenAgeRatingsService: why "sex-homosexuality"?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/19312532

OpenAgeRatingsService: why "sex-homosexuality"? - sh.itjust.works

I can understand why all the other things would be listed here, and I would understand if sexuality in general was considered inappropriate for children, but why homosexuality in particular? This is strange to me. <content_rating type="oars-1.1"> <content_attribute id="violence-cartoon">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-fantasy">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-realistic">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-bloodshed">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-sexual">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-desecration">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-slavery">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="violence-worship">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-alcohol">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-narcotics">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="drugs-tobacco">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-nudity">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-themes">none</content_attribute> <!-- this line here --> <content_attribute id="sex-homosexuality">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-prostitution">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-adultery">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="sex-appearance">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-profanity">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-humor">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="language-discrimination">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-chat">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-info">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-audio">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-location">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="social-contacts">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="money-purchasing">none</content_attribute> <content_attribute id="money-gambling">none</content_attribute> </content_rating>

Because by law in certain countries, homosexuality is persona non grata, and a filter needs to be there to legally operate in such countries.
Do these backward shepherds that stone their wives need computers?
The Republican culture war being waged against the LGBT+ community should make it completely clear that your skin color or brand of religious nonsense doesn’t make you immune to bigotry.

if the democrats would stop drumming up as much hatred as possible towards us it wouldn’t have become such a large issue in the first place, People feel like it is getting worse, because it is. People who never even cared about whether someone was gay or not now has a strong negative association towards us because democrats have the incessant need to shove it everywhere they go.

It’s no surprise that people are starting to hate gay folk when they get shit for so much as looking away when they see gay people kiss in public. The amount of time’s I’ve had to say “I’m not one of those gay people” is absurd.

The far-right is not the Democrats fault and I don’t know why you’re bragging about selling out your community.
it’s not the “far right” that’s the issue, it’s the fact that the far left is generating high amounts of animosity from anyone relatively centrist.
“Thanks for pushing normal people to the far-right” is an overt strategy passed around 4chan and far-right chat channels, intended to both discourage the left from defending their views and create the idea that being bigoted is something “normal people” support.
I disagree that it it’s bigoted to for instance, not like games which have rewritten characters to fit a certain demographic, whether it be sexuality or race.