Covers have a purpose: they signal the genre within.

A cartoon cover of two people dressed casually for camping does not--and I *cannot* stress this enough--signal EROTICA to anyone.

Holy jumping WHAT THE HELL, #HarperCollinsUK, WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL--you are setting that book (and its author) up to fail.

#CartoonCoverFail #CategoryTagFail

@romancelandia @bookstodon

@herhandsmyhands @romancelandia @bookstodon Plus there's no pursuit -- they're standing with their backs to each other.

Show one chasing the other and it would already improve somewhat.

@herhandsmyhands @romancelandia @bookstodon yes this looks like "Sweet Romance". Setting themselves up for bad reviews
@Zumbador I thought "rom com" myself--either way, I didn't even think "open door sex", let alone EROTICA.
@herhandsmyhands They need to put the peppers at the top and bigger, my eyes don't really register them. I guess peppers are less embarrassing to younger readers than clinch covers.
I don't like the feeling of hiding here.

@WhiskeyintheJar I didn't even notice the famous peppers until someone else pointed them out!

And YES, the idea that sexuality must be hidden in code to be palatable is offensive, period.

@herhandsmyhands @romancelandia @bookstodon OK, but is it erotica or is it women's fiction? Because I'm really struggling with the idea that it's both. Maybe very steamy women's lit? I feel like they are casting way too wide a net here...

@Jaycee YES

If I understand correctly, the *publisher* tells NetGalley what tags to put in there, and given the range, they asked for "everything that women read" or some such bullshit.

@herhandsmyhands Some such bullshit is right...

@herhandsmyhands @romancelandia @bookstodon

The vector illo style isn't helping this at all. If you told me this was NA hiking/college romance, with fade to black closed-door intimacy, I'd be more willing to believe it than if you handed this to me and said it's erotica. Oof.