Results of a poll of the #nixos governance folks entitled "What do you want for the future of the Nix project governance?'" Although unauthenticated and publicly open, it was stealthy enough that I didn't know it was underway.

https://pol.is/report/r4zurrpweay6khmsaab4e

pol.is report

@chrism fascinating how "nazis, racists, transphobes, sexists bad" is not a shared sentiment
@jakehamilton not particularly
@chrism interesting how the group voting against that also votes against some specific other things. It's seeming fairly clear what the intent is.
@jakehamilton just say it jake

@chrism well, judging from the results of the poll here it looks like group B seems to be okay with a toxic environment. Feeling that nazis and racists should be accepted, identities shouldn't be respected, sealioning is acceptable, and ignorance of the effects of our actions is too.

Unless I'm reading the results wrong.

@chrism just to be clear Chris, this isn't a dig at or related to you. I am actually just looking at and talking about the poll results and trying to make sense of them.

@chrism hexa clarified a bit it looks like:

https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/435937-constitutional-assembly/topic/Experiment.20with.20pol.2Eis/near/437832070

> Please don't treat the results as if it represents the correct groups or proportions. Without auth this can merely serve as an example of how such a poll may look.