Hard to imagine a signal that a website is a rugpull more intense than banning users for trying to delete their own posts

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/stack-overflow-bans-users-en-masse-for-rebelling-against-openai-partnership-users-banned-for-deleting-answers-to-prevent-them-being-used-to-train-chatgpt

Like just incredible "burning the future to power the present" energy here

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT

Stack Overflow is overflowing with salt.

Tom's Hardware

@mcc

I have dealt with novice coders for 40 years. I've told them to steer clear of SO - ask me if you've got a question about anything.

#StuckOverflow isn't entirely bad, but there's enough rat shit stirred into that pudding I would never trust anything trained on its data.

@tuban_muzuru I like Stack Overflow, but the problem with it is that it's so old that many of the questions are from like 2008-2015 and that means that often it gives you an answer that was correct ten years ago but is wrong now. (Sometimes they exacerbate this by closing a new question because it's a duplicate of a 2010 one full of outdated answers!)

So… the new "don't forget, you're here forever" policies will probably exacerbate this problem, if fewer high-quality answers come in after 2024.

@tuban_muzuru @mcc

i'll always remember taking the time to write a full question, with what i tried and what didn't work, to receive an answer that just said "duplicate, closing", without linking to where the duplicate was.

meanwhile a friend who wasn't a programmer asked the same question at the same time but super vague and with minimal effort. he got answers instantly (that were not usable because too vague).

if you punish effort and only answer the easy questions, i don't want any part of it