"Recusal . . . it does not require a showing of actual bias. Rather, as the Supreme Court has explained, it simply asks whether “an objective observer” in the public “would have questioned [the judge’s] impartiality.” That is clearly the case with Cannon.. . . judge’s actions in the case would cause an objective observer to doubt the fairness of the proceedings."
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/06/trump-indictment-remove-judge-aileen-cannon.html
Aileen Cannon’s Previous Rulings About Trump Demand Her Recusal

Ultimately, Cannon should do the ethical thing and recuse herself. If she chooses not to, she should be removed.

Slate
2/2
"Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge “shall disqualify himself [or herself] in any proceeding in which his [or her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Cannon’s situation clearly fits that test, and she is obligated to recuse herself in Trump’s case."
#AileenCannon #TrumpCrimeCartel
#espionage