The terms Hamas had agreed to were not immediately clear, but a senior Israeli official quickly said that the terms were not those that Israel had agreed to.

Looks like the headline matches reality.

You keep spewing totalitarian cacophony, you crazy diamond.

A ceasefire for you is when israel can keep committing Genocide and Hamas doesn’t fight back right?

A ceasefire is when both sides agree to cease firing. The article headline is quite clearly correct, but I know you aren’t interested in facts.

Conveniently ignore that Hamas accepted the ceasefire deal proposed by Egypt and Qatar, which means that both sides very well know what is in the deal.

Conveniently ignore that Hamas accepted the ceasefire deal proposed by Egypt and Qatar, which means that both israel and Hamas very well know what is in the deal.

And Israel says the deal Hamas agreed to isn’t the deal they agreed to. Did you even read the article? Jesus Christ.

Good job you got there!

Hamas accepts the deal.

Israel rejects the deal.

See that’s what the article title should be. Not “complicates things”.

I accept the deal in which you hand deliver me all of your money.

When should I be expecting you?

(For the record, I’m 100% in favour of Israel immediately stopping all offensive action and immediately withdrawing from Gaza and being forced to immediately let aid in)

But this particular sticking point is kinda nonsense. If both parties aren’t involved in the development of the terms, then it’s just a political stunt to announce you’ve accepted them.

Israel could JUST as easily draft their own terms, and announce they’ve agreed to them.