The terms Hamas had agreed to were not immediately clear, but a senior Israeli official quickly said that the terms were not those that Israel had agreed to.

Looks like the headline matches reality.

You keep spewing totalitarian cacophony, you crazy diamond.

A ceasefire for you is when israel can keep committing Genocide and Hamas doesn’t fight back right?

A ceasefire is when both sides agree to cease firing. The article headline is quite clearly correct, but I know you aren’t interested in facts.

Conveniently ignore that Hamas accepted the ceasefire deal proposed by Egypt and Qatar, which means that both sides very well know what is in the deal.

Conveniently ignore that Hamas accepted the ceasefire deal proposed by Egypt and Qatar, which means that both israel and Hamas very well know what is in the deal.

And Israel says the deal Hamas agreed to isn’t the deal they agreed to. Did you even read the article? Jesus Christ.

Good job you got there!

Hamas accepts the deal.

Israel rejects the deal.

See that’s what the article title should be. Not “complicates things”.

Hamas accepts the deal. Israel’s final response is uncertain - they commented that it was not the deal they agreed to, and it is not simply a matter of “Hamas has agreed, the ceasefire can go into effect”. But neither is it a rejection on the Israeli side. It ‘complicates things’.

Keep trying. You’ll show those big bad Lamestream Media types what for eventually, right?