When European settler colonists first encountered the indigenous communities of northeastern North America, many things surprised them about the indigenous communities.

Among these, the Europeans were surprised to discover how restrained and personally responsible the people in these communities were. They very, very rarely engaged in interpersonal violence. They didn’t insult each other; they didn’t lose their tempers around each other.

The Europeans were also surprised to discover that the people in these communities rarely, if ever, disciplined their children. They were, the Europeans believed, impossibly indulgent with their children, allowing them immense personal freedom.

I think it would surprise many contemporary readers that those two things don’t conflict with each other. People living in contemporary state-capitalist modernity tend to assume that children require quite rigid discipline, the routinized order of mass schooling, and fairly constant coercion to keep them out of trouble and turn them into civilized, responsible adults.

It turns out that lots of things we assume to be self-evidently true are not actually true at all.

@HeavenlyPossum

Forgive me for observing an underlying topic here, but it sounds so wrong, in all literatures, the idea of the "colonization".

From Canada to Argentina, the arrival of the Europeans, was just invasion: these lands were inhabited and had their civilizations or tribes, depending on the region of the American continent...

@HeavenlyPossum

For example, I cannot relate the arrival of Cortez, as an act of colonization, but indeed in invasion: claiming lands and resources that were in possession of another people. Same goes for Pizarro, Cabral, pilgrims who expelled indigenous groups from their own lands, even though they were invited to stay there, learn about the resources, the weather conditions, and once they were adapted, they imposed their will on taking those lands (Bury My Heart at Wonder Knee).

@HeavenlyPossum

Again, sorry for observing an underlying topic here, but I felt I had to.

And regarding the topic itself, this idea of regulating people on doing things, following a framework that doesn't take into consideration living instead of existing, embracing nature instead of feeding the capitalism machine, imo, is what put us on an environment of anxiety and struggle to be happy in the long term.

Indigenous communities were free, and they wanted that way for their descendants. Tks.