In recent years the profile and credibility of open source research has grown. It seems everybody’s doing it – but not necessarily well. Learning to recognise these common mistakes will allow you to judge the quality of open source research:
https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/2024/04/25/oshit-seven-deadly-sins-of-bad-open-source-research/?utm_source=mstdn
OSHIT: Seven Deadly Sins of Bad Open Source Research - bellingcat
Learning to recognise these widespread mistakes will help you judge the quality of open source analysis — or improve your own.
bellingcatThis example, highlighted by Dr. Manisha Ganguly, shows an account misidentifying clouds as missile craters. The heightened tensions surrounding conflicts can often lead accounts to publish quickly without double checking.
A common mistake is to add large watermarks to footage, which complicates attempts to verify or geolocate it. Habits like these make open source researchers’ work much more difficult.
Here’s an example of what not to do:
Another unhelpful habit is to remove links to the original source. This makes it harder to know when footage was first posted and by whom – potentially very valuable information.
As
@404mediaco reports, ‘OSINT’ accounts don’t always produce helpful content. This is why we must remember the central point of open source research – think critically.
https://www.404media.co/twitter-verified-osint-accounts-are-destroying-the-israel-palestine-information-ecosystem/‘Verified’ OSINT Accounts Are Destroying the Israel-Palestine Information Ecosystem
The problem with profit and engagement driven misinformation from pseudo-OSINT accounts during the Israel-Palestine conflict is "unprecedented." One expert said after Musk's recent changes "all hell broke loose."
404 MediaEverybody makes mistakes. But a good open source researcher is open about making them – they correct them quickly and vow to do better next time.