@Radical_EgoCom

How you gonna do ?
The best i see it, its to start on ourselves.

// OTL

Because this idea(Georgisme) solves many of the problems and ills of our current societal world.

@emoore
The main point I have against Georgism is that it addresses only one aspect of economic inequality—land ownership—while ignoring other forms of exploitation inherent in capitalist systems, such as wage labor and private ownership of the means of production. Georgism does not go far enough in challenging the fundamental power structures and inequalities inherent in capitalism.

@Radical_EgoCom

I don't know where you did your research, but I find that it even answers certain points that you just mentioned.

But nature will leads use, and our knowledges tho.
like ants, an ant burrow certainly has guards and a queen, but a reserve of knowledge of pure memories, in the form of an egg with feromones well guarded, from generation to generations..

We will see my brother.
but love is somewhere and some of ours.
Or, other magics, materials or beings, will evolve fs
Earth 2.

@emoore
What exactly does Georgism do about wage labor and the private ownership of the means of production? Because those are also forms of capitalist exploitation that need to be dealt with.

@Radical_EgoCom

>>[[What exactly does Georgism do about wage labor and the private ownership-...]]

 Georgism does not have a specific position, but concentrates on natural resource tax and equal wealth distribution. I find that it is a good start for a fair and equitable system.

@emoore
And that is the main problem I have with Gregorism, that being that it only focuses on one aspect of exploitation and not any others. It sounds like it could be a good starting point in creating a more equitable and fair society, but in no way could Gregorism alone fix all the problems of the inherently exploitative and oppressive nature of capitalism.