It's @nyrath 's fault I think about cooling fins.
Interstellar ship - work in progress.
It's @nyrath 's fault I think about cooling fins.
Interstellar ship - work in progress.
I'll just mention that some historical radiator designs tried to cram in lots of radiators by interspersed-reflectors preventing radiator-cross-heating. See image. Feel free to totally ignore this comment.
For inspiration, you can go to the link and admire the pictures. Do not bother with the pesky equations.
I have just one more tip that you are free to totally ignore.
If the spaceship has a nuclear engine, it is a good idea to trim the heat radiators into a triangular shape.
The idea is to prevent the radiators from sticking out of the safe "shadow" cast by the anti-radiation shadow shield atop the nuclear engine.
Otherwise the radiators will backscatter deadly atomic radiation into the ship and kill the crew.
https://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/radiation.php#backscatter
Well ... this depends. I think the original design is okay.
See, it is labelled an "interstellar" ship, which implies cruise duration on the order of decades. As such, long term GCR shielding is a must, and this requires MUCH thicker shielding than the wimpy neutrons from a mere fission reactor (or even the fast neutrons of a fusion reaction).
The original design appears to have propellant tanks surrounding a central core (which may include the crew compartment?).
However, the number of radiator fins does seem excessive, and they do have a lot of mutual irradiation near the center. A smaller number of fins with larger area would be more optimal...
...well, you'd have to study it in more detail to figure out what's ideal. Hard to just guesstimate.