Responsibility is a capability. You have it, so you are responsible.
That is the definition.
@AdeptVeritatis @thor I feel this is a reductive and unhelpful definition. The ability to act on something does not make it necessarily practical to act.
People cannot act on all things that are not fine that they have a capability to affect, there are too many of them.
Different people have different capabilities, and it makes sense to focus efforts on different places.
Everyone capable of acting on something doing so without coordination can work out badly - for example, dog-piling.
1/
@AdeptVeritatis @thor Responsibility is often tied up with blame: "failure to be responsible", irresponsibility.
By passing responsibility on to everyone in view, it can take away responsibility from those who caused an issue, enabling breaking stuff without consequence.
Declaring all with capability comes responsibility can be used as a bludgeon to guilt-trip people with different priorities into action.
2/
TL;DR: Saying everyone should be responsible for what they are capable of sounds laudable, but inevitably turns into a judgement mechanism against an unreasonable standard.
You can be responsible. Or you can feel responsible.
One is a capability. The other is an emotion.
You put a lot of unnecessary personal involvement into it. Instead of just accepting, YOU construct something like a "guilt-trip".
That is, why deconstructing everything until only the bare minimum is left, is a better approach. For me at least.
Whatever you want to deny, pushing around the feeling of responsibility will not help you.
Use your responsibility with full capacity. It is a capability. It is worth something. A lot!
@nloadholtes
KC Green himself has addressed this.
Attached: 1 image @[email protected] KC Green himself has addressed this. https://topatoco.com/collections/this-is-fine
@nloadholtes
I like the original better.
#thisisnotfine https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1154760-this-is-fine