RoflmasterbigpimpDon't worry they can't kill us, they just supress us
(Hello first Post here, if this one is too low-effort I will remove it and apologize.)
JackRiddleYou don’t have to remove it, but I want an apology video with a cute pet on camera please
Can’t I lust link one of Logan Pauls?
While the post doesn’t have oversexualised f35, it’s still within NCD spirit I think
nukeAll good, and thanks for censoring the names
verity_kindlejust the right amount of effort. you’re ok, just don’t forget to bring Kensington Breakfast for everybody next time.
<3 for the post
<3 <3 for this comment
<3 <3 <3 for the name obstruction
America is doomed.
The Guy with the knife was in Australia
Maybe the weapon apologist is from America
The commenter was almost certainly a Yankee Doofus though.
Or a prick from Europe.
MaggiWuerzeCivilians owning automatic guns is not really a thing here
Oh yeah? You don’t say.
Depends where in Europe, in a lot of countries it’s quite common (although not anywhere near the amount of the US), it’s just that the culture is so different that most Europeans don’t flaunt them or see them as a part of their identity like Americans do
skillissueri’m like 90% sure he’s american and sold guns in the past
it’s the birth of new pierre sprey
Honestly, I’d say they’re even worse.
i think that reformism and .45 boomerism come from the same strain of thought. yeah no shit recoil is hard to control with full power cartridge (like AR-10 in .308 that he has), that’s why intermediate cartridge was developed. this gets worse in handguns
itslilithHe’s still going on, arguing that a shooting would’ve caused less casualties
Would my full automatic knife do more or less damage according to him?
You should ask him, at the moment he’s arguing that being shot is perfectly safe, actually
It’s the rat penis all over again, isn’t it?
OK, I'm out of the loop on that one, and the curiosity is just too much for me...got a link?
Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article - awful.systems
> Appall and scorn ripped through scientists’ social media networks Thursday as several egregiously bad AI-generated figures circulated from a peer-reviewed article recently published in a reputable journal. Those figures—which the authors acknowledge in the article’s text were made by Midjourney—are all uninterpretable. They contain gibberish text and, most strikingly, one includes an image of a rat with grotesquely large and bizarre genitals, as well as a text label of “dck.” A dck pck, if you will. Count me among the “some scientists online” who “questioned whether the text was also AI-generated”. I mean, it’s a disjointed mess [https://scienceintegritydigest.files.wordpress.com/2024/02/fcell-11-1339390.pdf]. Right off, we get this: > The term “stem cell” was first coined in 1901 by Regaud Um, no [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18371332/]. But if that could be taken for human error, what about a sentence like this: > They were physically sheared and digested with a solution of DnaseI, hyaluronidase, collagenase, and trypsin using a two-step enzymatic digestion method in which the digestive enzymes included DnaseI, hyaluronidase, collagenase, and trypsin. Just a bit before that, the text does a swerve into what sounds like a specific experiment, which doesn’t fit with its surroundings and is very strange in a review article. My guess is the whole thing was made by stitching together LLM responses. The publisher, Frontiers Media, is not exactly held in high regard overall [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontiers_Media#Controversies].
Damn that sum bich got 4 testtomcels
OK, that rat has much bigger problems than just the penis.
but does he tramioncatiie his zжpens?
“Sstabie Stab Riealy Fist”
The thread is so funny
Thread here for those looking
'Run, run, run': Chaos at a Sydney mall as 6 people stabbed to death, and the suspect fatally shot - Lemmy.World
A man stabbed six people to death at a busy Sydney [https://apnews.com/hub/sydney] shopping center Saturday before he was fatally shot, police said, with hundreds fleeing the chaotic scene, many weeping as they carried their children. Eight people, including a 9-month-old, were injured. New South Wales police said they believed a 40-year-old man was responsible for the Saturday afternoon attack at the Westfield Shopping Centre in Bondi Junction, in the city’s eastern suburbs and not far from the world-famous Bondi Beach. They said they were not able to name him until a formal identification had taken place but that they weren’t treating the attack as terrorism-related. The man was shot dead by a police inspector after he turned and raised a knife, New South Wales Assistant Police Commissioner Anthony Cooke told reporters.
According to him, lungs are non vital organs
Reject lungs, return to ocean.
I mean you have two, they’re the kidneys of the thorax.
The “Tell me your only exposure to automatic weapons is Call of Duty” comment got a good chortle out of me.
I’m glad it did. Dude just kept digging too though.
What we really need is to give everyone fully-automatic knives to prevent this sort of thing from happening.
It’s because having a weapon out slows you down. Everybody knows you run faster when your knife is out
Civilians should only be able to buy hand grenades for self defence, as they are very inaccurate, and everybody having them guarantees MAD. Peace achieved
Like a string of black cats going off.
Tbf, it’s legal in the NFA. You just have tobpay the $200 tax stamp and wait for ATF approval for each one
What? That’s not true at all. Grenades are classified as “destructive devices” under the National Firearms Act, and illegal for civilians to own.
<$50 grenade, $200 tax stamp lol
does it work for artillery too?
Yes, actually. Grenades, artillery, tank shells, and anything that goes boom is classified as a “destructive device” by the ATF.
That means the same treatment as automatics: registration, background check, and a $200 tax stamp per unit.
But the drone is tax free! Checkmate, government!
Sounds like you need to buy nicer grenades
How dare you, Pyotr hooks me up with only the best surplus.
I am sorry, I really cannot possibly understand why a civilian outside of an active conflict zone can possibly need a grenade?
Is that your 4th of July tradition or something?
what if there a really scary snake burrowed ??? need boom boom to get rid of danger noodle
Hmmm. Never thought of that. On the other hand, I have some foxes problem in my garden. Surely a few well thrown grenades could help. Thank you for opening my eyes! Will lobby for a change in the laws of my land.
You don’t even need grenades for that, just pour gasoline down the foxhole and toss in a lit match.
Nah, they do not actually live there, they are just browsing every night, shit on my lawn and throw around rubbish if they manage to open the bin.
So I do need a tripwire or two.
Too bad neighbours’ cats are also on a prowl, that is the only thing that limits my demolition urges!
Fishing
Right after I get rid of snakes and foxes!
to throw them in the (uninhabitated) forest on a date, of course
I’ll bite, we certainly have different dating preferences! Who exactly one should date in an uninhabited forest? )
(it’s an obscure reference to one lazerpig’s video when he mentioned that he and his russian boyfriend went on a date which included buying grenades from a corrupt supply officer and throwing them in the forest while drunk)
Is this a Lazerpig reference?
Honestly I have no idea if this is close to being correct but I feel like grenades are similar enough to dynamite which is (I think-again no actual clue) still used for mining and construction. It’d be more problematic to delineate one as a construction tool and one as a death tool so they keep them all under the same umbrella. Again, this comment is 1000% unfounded guessing.
Well, there is some sense in that. Mining/construction would require special licensing as well for it, and that would be fun to watch a miner or builder using frags to demolish something. )
Silencer is the same to me, as you rightly point out: this is never a self-defence device, there is no conceivable use for one if you are not a certain Bond, J Bond. Who also had a rather specific license!