Information Is BeautifulAsk ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 - which does it pick? (by Leniolabs)
Bart Wronski 🇺🇦🇵🇸@infobeautiful anytime you post things like this, please specify the model and if it's base on pro. Pro does it well - generates numpy code, runs it, and then gives the output. 100% correct.
Anthony Sorace@BartWronski @infobeautiful Note that you are asking a different question.
@a @infobeautiful the same for me! And those models sometimes don't work and produce errors - we know that. And it's ok to post those limitations so people don't take those answers for granted.
I am simply asking that people specify if they use the free or Pro version. In my experience, the difference is *dramatic*.
I am simply asking that people specify if they use the free or Pro version. In my experience, the difference is *dramatic*.
@a @infobeautiful And it's not about the quality of the model - the Pro version will write and run code to get those answers. Including some analytical math problems! (like integrals, derivatives, solutions to equations etc). It's exactly what I'd do as a coder myself, so it's a great time saver. :)
@a @infobeautiful I feel like too many people (both critics and "AGI is close" grifters) focus on LLMs as problem solvers or knowledge bases/engines.
They are not!
They are natural language models, able to "understand" (put in quotes, as I don't think they truly understand, just are advanced translation models) human inputs and translate them to code, queries - and run and translate them back.
This makes them incredibly useful in practice, even if it's not (might never be?) some "magic AGI".
They are not!
They are natural language models, able to "understand" (put in quotes, as I don't think they truly understand, just are advanced translation models) human inputs and translate them to code, queries - and run and translate them back.
This makes them incredibly useful in practice, even if it's not (might never be?) some "magic AGI".