AI generation when writing software is a false economy. You are replacing writing code with code review. Code review is harder and requires you to already have an understanding of the domain which often means that you would’ve even able to write it yourself to begin with. If you code gen something because you don’t know how to write it yourself, you by definition cannot review it without going though an effort equivalent to writing it yourself in the first place.

Unless of course you don’t care about code review and so doom yourself into treating software like magical incantations that break randomly for no perceivable reason; but no good mage would do that, surely.

@mary absolutely, I've been chanting the same is true for ai art / assets. Companies who onboard ai art even without laying off artists directly, will change their function to be asset reviewers in the pipeline, checking models, removing a 6th finger here and there etc.
This has already been the case for buying asset packs from the store, just with higher reliability.
the work still need to be done, the only thing org is replacing is the creative part of the job (engineers and artists alike)