Elsevier, everyone's favorite copyright maximalist closed-access publisher, argues that their high costs are necessary because they're the arbiter of quality.

The arbiter of quality keeps publishing LLM-written papers. Thanks for making my argument for me, Elsevier! They didn't even read it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

"In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model."

@cliffle
OMFG the paper is still up!
@echanda @cliffle March 19 (4 days later) and it's STILL there. 🤦🏼‍♂️
@yohannon @echanda @cliffle still there today 4th April 2024.
@mikegolf @echanda @cliffle wow… you’d think after a few weeks someone would have pulled it. 🤦🏻‍♂️