Open source software is a critical part of our national security infrastructure, but one that government is entirely neglecting. Federal agencies rely on OpenSSL, liblzma, etc. just as much as the private sector.

We need a division of federal government whose job isn’t to find and exploit security holes (like the NSA), but fix them. A sort of a national security agency, but that actually does…that.

@waldoj mmm.... sure, fine, that would be great, but how about addressing the problem _before_ the issues get created? My dream is for the government to fund open source development directly, a US version of the Sovereign Tech Fund.

@jacob @waldoj STF’s approach, while nice, would not have addressed this, because xz would never have made it to their radar. You need not just a lot more money (though there is that) but also the supported projects need to be driven by data on usage, not a grant-making process.

(Yes, obviously I have opinions here; and yes I’m working frantically to make the federal government a big Tidelift customer…)

@luis_in_brief @jacob @waldoj Could you elaborate on what you mean by “never made it to their radar”? Maintainers can apply through a light-weight process, and we also scout and reach out to critical technologies. May be a good topic for Upstream with @krakenbuerger in June.

@sovtechfund I super appreciate the work you do, hope you do more of it, and hope others copy your model. But that said I do have feedback. Context: I work on, and and am friends with, dozens of maintainers working on perhaps "critical" technology, and:

(a) I'm not aware of any direct outreach to STF to any of us

(b) last I looked the application didn't seem particularly “lightweight”. Perhaps it's changed?

Again huge <3s for your work but I don't think it's as accessible as you think it is.

@jacob thank you for the feedback! We are always trying to improve, and appreciate the points you’re bringing up.