The best websites in the world, the ones that got us all hooked on the internet in the first place, people hand built them in HTML.
Even sites with content management tools, you wrote HTML into forms.

@benbrown And the best part was you could make it as weird and as messy as you wanted!

My siblings and I had a really old and really shitty Pokémon fan site back in the late 90s/early 2000s and we were just learning as we went along, and the design was awful as all getup, but it was personalized and felt organic!

@benbrown Remix has this feel again for me. I remember trying to figure out Homesite and IIS and how the hell all of this was going to work. It led to PHP 3 and MySQL, eventually Rails where this and more made sense for me. Now, so many good choices. But in the beginning, I had to build and export to a wwwroot folder or something. I was confused but I didn't know I was.
@benbrown Microsoft FrontPage 97 put a GUI and wyziwyg editor over the HTML. Buggy in some areas but an amazing table editor.
@jgordon that was the beginning of the fall where the quality of HTML dropped precipitously and only barely recovered thanks to the efforts of the web standards movement
@benbrown Yea, Hugo has been around for awhile, but I'm thinking about moving to that. It's still a Jamstack, but just poops out static HTML...not JS.

@benbrown ... and lost their minds doing so.

(I've tried to do railroad timetables in just html. They're pretty much the definition of write-only pages!)

@benbrown

CREATED WITH:
- vi
- emacs
- cat & ^D

@benbrown @Taffer I’m team hand-coded-HTML. My site is little more than a custom link tree today, but I have bigger projects in the works. HTML has also gotten insanely more capable, in the last 5 years even.