You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction.
I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.
@AuthorJMac I just asked AI, and it informed me that dishwashers, as well as washers and dryers exist.
@anakin78z Once they can load and unload themselves, we can talk. Otherwise, I'm still doing dishes and laundry.
@AuthorJMac
You're not doing laundry and dishes. You're just loading and unloading.
AI art doesn't generate and apply itself either.
@anakin78z You're seriously missing the point.

@AuthorJMac You asked for dishwashing and laundry to be automated. People did. Now you're saying 'not like that'.

People are automating art & writing. But it doesn't replace the whole process. The idea that AI replaces every part of the process is fully false. So your analogy doesn't work. If you look at any production out there actually using AI, they take weeks, months, etc. Why? Because it's just another tool in a process.

If you want tools to free up your time, they probably can already.

@anakin78z No, I said that if we're automating anything with AI, I'd prefer automation of things that people generally don't enjoy than things that people do enjoy. Laundry and dishes were just examples.

And if you think it doesn't replace the whole process, you haven't been paying attention to what's going on in creative industries and those industries who used to employ creative freelancers.
It could have been just a tool. It's been a money-saving and money grabbing replacement which development's ethical side is in question. To me, AI isn't the next step in creativity. It's a tool of greed.

It could have been great. But well, some humans prove over and over again that we can't have nice things.