Dear @Gargron,

A fediverse server called Threads is violating mastodon.social’s second server rule:

“2. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia…
Transphobic behavior such as intentional misgendering and deadnaming is strictly prohibited.”

https://glaad.org/smsi/report-meta-fails-to-moderate-extreme-anti-trans-hate-across-facebook-instagram-and-threads/

Can you please defederate from this server to protect the trans people on mastodon.social?

Thank you.

PS. It’s run by these guys: https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/26/facebook-secret-project-snooped-snapchat-user-traffic/

#mastodonSocial #fediblock #threads #meta #mastodon #transphobia

Report – Unsafe: Meta Fails to Moderate Extreme Anti-trans Hate Across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads | GLAAD

GLAAD’s Social Media Safety Program reported the following anti-trans hate content across Instagram, Facebook, and Threads; Meta deemed all of it non-violative or did not take action on it.

GLAAD | GLAAD rewrites the script for LGBTQ acceptance.
@aral Genuine question, how is defederating threads protecting trans people?
@eatyourglory @aral because trans people are babies, they cannot know how to defend themself, and like... use mastodon to block servers and users, so big admin guy have to think for them.

I guess.
@eatyourglory In the same way that defederating Gab is.
@eatyourglory @aral Will anything of actual value be lost by kicking Threads to the curb? I doubt it. If the users there cant figure out how to join an instance with actual moderation that is very much a them problem and nowhere near a me problem.
@eatyourglory @aral by not giving established hate groups and their large audiences direct access to us.

@eatyourglory @aral

By preventing anti-trans bigotry from spreading to other servers.

It is a long-standing principle on the Fediverse that if an instance refuses to moderate hate content, the instance is defederated.

Meta is refusing to moderate hate content so it should be defederated.

@eatyourglory @aral

Did you even look at the article?

@violetmadder @aral I did. The article didn't directly say that defederating threads would protect trans people.

@eatyourglory @aral

Do you honestly not understand the concept of blocking servers that allow hate speech, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

@violetmadder @aral I was just trying to get some clarification.

@eatyourglory @aral

Simple: Threads wants to be federated. If they didn't want to, they wouldn't have entered a federation. Depriving them of something they want until they improve their moderation in favor of the welfare of trans people motivates them (Threads) to do more to protect trans people.

Threads/Meta likes being big. But instances are necessarily small enough to have effective moderation. They can adopt that model, or go elsewhere.

@Professor_Stevens @aral I see. What do you think about the moderation on mastodon.social then?