This analogy is so absurd. Like if you have a vote on driving off a cliff, the answer is not to treat the vote as legitimate. The answer is to artempt to stop the bus by any means necessary. Pry open the engine panel and chuck a wrench in the gears, cut the fuel line, break the shifter lever, anything, just get off the fucking bus. Neither driver should be trusted.

The thing is, doing that is a great way to lose credibility. You’re basically sinking to the same level as the fascists.

Oh because of the violence? Driving off a cliff is also violent behaviour, and with the bus as it is the cliff is inevitable, because the cliff drivers will always gey back in. Also, the other guy isn’t the icecream guy. He’s the guy who promised to stop for icecream but doesn’t want to tell you if or how fast he plans to drive off the cliff. He’s open to debate on the issue, but he has a lot cliff driving friends and they often cast the deciding vote in cliff driving matters.

They’re both getting us off the cliff, just one is being more coy and circumspect than the other.

The only reason to vote for the less-immediate cliff driver is to give you more time to stop the bus.

Let me know when you start the violence. It’s easy as fuck to sit behind your iphone calling others to die.