It's important to understand that "age verification" schemes being passed by states, ostensibly to "protect the children", won't do that and will bring about incredible abuses.

In order to age verify children, obviously EVERYBODY of any age must be verified, for every account, under every name or pseudonym, ultimately on every site no matter how public or private the topic, and before downloading any apps.

Children will find ways to work around this. They'll use the accounts of adults, which will be openly traded. But because these age verification systems must by definition be based on government IDs, the verification process creates a linkage between your account names and your actual identity, subjecting you to all manner of leaked personal information, government abuses (think MAGA in charge), and worse. Firms will claim their systems either don't keep this data or can't be abused. History strongly suggests otherwise, and when courts step in, those firms will have to do what the courts say, often in secret, when it comes to collecting data.

Age verification is in actuality a massive Chinese-style Internet identity tracking project -- nothing less -- and there are many politicians in the U.S. who look with envy at how China controls their Internet and keeps their Internet users under police state controls.

@lauren I guess one would be deluded in hoping that legislators, from the same side that claims to distrust invasive gummint, may understand that one can have a zero-knowledge proof of age.
@fgcallari Nope. Age verification wet dreams are fully bipartisan.
@lauren Guess the way to educate them would be along the lines of: what if the next category of websites that are mandated to do age verification were all those that show gun & ammo porn?
@fgcallari In fact, efforts are already in progress to extend to all sites that might contain "content unsuitable for children." Pretty clear what the endgame is, eh?