#writersCoffeeClub 3/22: Are there any books which should be banned, or is book banning always wrong?

I draw a line between fiction and non-fiction (or fic presented as non-fic) intended to persuade or make an ideological argument. Clearly-identified fiction shouldn't be banned. Presenting-as-non-fic like "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is flat-out toxic to a society, as is non-fic crank science and "scientific racism", eg. "The Bell Curve".

The Bible? Toxic AF, presents as non-fic: ban!

@cstross to avoid banning anything, you might have an SCP-style ‘restricted: cognitohazard’ section for anything which (a) presents as non-fiction without substantiation and (b) shows any tendency towards memetic infectiousness.
These books are still available, but periodic psych assessments are mandatory if you enter the restricted section even once.