HLMenckenFanElon Musk's X Is Suspending Accounts That Reveal a Neo-Nazi Cartoonist's Alleged Identity
Hobbes_DentTwo people who have no clue what free speech means.
They don’t care what free speech means.
jeffwSure would be a shame if someone linked to the original doxxing
Edit: it’s actually a great read. You can skip some parts if you want, like all the BS cartoons (do they need that many examples?)
Oh, that one
I appreciate that they included as much information as they did to really solidify their points.
jordanlundBeing reported as doxxing, but I don’t see anything in our rules or the lemmy.world rules that would block this.
I’ll float it to the admins and see what they say.
ryannathansDoxing is permitted? Wow
That’s where I expected to find it, but it’s oddly silent on the issue.
Erm, doxxing is allowed because we’re the good guys.
It’s not, but the phrasing could be stronger:
Terms of Service
Introduction Greetings, the good people of the world! This Terms of Service applies to your access to and active use of https://lemmy.world, it's API's and sub-domain services (ex alt GUIs)(we, us, our the website, Lemmy.World, or LW) as well as all other properties and services associated with Lemmy.World. Lemmy.World is intended to host and power online communities from all over the world, and to be a place reliable for your casual entertainment. As sweet as this is, it doesn’t keep us from needing to set basic rules.
I mean, it was doxxing, but it’s sort of common knowledge since this was published. They ripped the band aid off and now the info is everywhere. It’s sort of pointless to delete it if it’s already out there imo
Edit: Also, if you want to be a fuckin celebrity, deal with it. You got doxxed. You can’t really be famous and anonymous. It’s one thing when it’s Guliani calling on people to harass some random ass election workers, it’s another when you’re kinda famous
if you want to be a fuckin celebrity, deal with it.
Did this big smelly butthole wanna be a celebrity or wanna sell crappy merch and hate people?
When I try to remove my bias…
Would I expect Elmousk to remove my real name if I made comics shitting on nazi buttplugs like in the OP?
Legit question. I should be able to make anti-nazi comics without getting firebombed, period.
Buttt I kinda deserve to get fired if I’m employed by a pro-nazi boss and my infosec sucks and my name leaks.
Any of y’all got answers?
This isn’t doxxing, it’s reporting on doxxing.
Completely different and totally cool!
Well, what I linked to was the original doxxing
You’re innocent!
My work is similar to those often featured by Charlie Hebdo, published in the New York Times, and shown on Family Guy
Guy thinks pretty highly of his shitty cartoons.
Lemme guess his bio:
About Me: <see: Jesus Christ>
Hah, my work is similar, that’s brilliant actually.
As I’m writing this comment I’m using words often used by William Shakespeare, Winston Churchill, Lady Gaga, as well as words featured in the King James Bible.
Speaking with the admins, I’m going to remove this comment based on this lemmy.world policy:
legal.lemmy.world/tos/#2-respecting-other-users-p…
The phrasing is a little vague, there’s some discussion on re-writing it and what the definition of “publicly available” is.
If things change and the comment is allowed under the new phrasing, I’ll restore it. For now we’re choosing to err on the side of caution.
Terms of Service
Introduction Greetings, the good people of the world! This Terms of Service applies to your access to and active use of https://lemmy.world, it's API's and sub-domain services (ex alt GUIs)(we, us, our the website, Lemmy.World, or LW) as well as all other properties and services associated with Lemmy.World. Lemmy.World is intended to host and power online communities from all over the world, and to be a place reliable for your casual entertainment. As sweet as this is, it doesn’t keep us from needing to set basic rules.
or that it is publicly available information
Isn’t it though? That’s sort of the point of the article. Also, his name is now publicly available many places.
We’re treating it like this, if reputable news sources aren’t allowing it, then we aren’t allowing it either.
Fair enough
JesusThose cartoons. Yikes.
samus12345So many owned strawmen.
Uhh the article just casually throws out there the phrase neo-nazi homeschooling network like that is a collection of words that can exist together now. Ffs.
😭 not clicking not clicking
It’s a vice news article from last year.
Well I mean, it is.
There’s a known network for homeschooling that’s based around wildly fascist views, actively teaching those values.
Pager U?
Yeah I think it’s under a different name but written by the same folks
irreticentThere are different groups but here’s an article about one of the groups:
I watched a documentary on Netflix about it.
In related news:
And now my search history contains “Nazi homeschooling.”
Was it illegal to do what they did to the guy? Thats the only reason Elon says he would ever take any content down from X
HominineFree speech*
They made a new policy just for him!
“The posts that were removed were all actioned correctly,” says Joe Benarroch, head of business operations at X, adding that the posts violated the company’s “posting private information policy” for “outing the identity of an anonymous user.”
While X does have a policy around sharing private information, the company’s terms of service on March 20 did not mention a policy related to outing the identity of an anonymous user, and Benarroch did not respond to a request for clarification. On March 21, after WIRED published this story, X updated its privacy policy to specifically prohibit posting the ”the identity of an anonymous user, such as their name or media depicting them.”
Kinda surprising they didn’t have a do Xing policy prior to this, no?
How long until PG ignores that rule when some normal, non-Nazi gets doxxed? I give it maybe 2 mooches.
ShaggySnacksAmericans and their mooches. Why not join the rest world and tell time the correct, lettuces.
So The New York Times will be banned with extreme prejudice for doxxing F1nn5ter the other day, right Anakin?
Anakin?
That didn’t sound right - it was The Times!
And of course ;)
A lengthy X thread posted by the antifascist research group Anonymous Comrades Collective last week claimed that Stonetoss is a man named Hans Kristian Graebener from Spring, Texas. Stonetoss cartoons, which feature simple and colorful imagery coupled with racist, homophobic, and antisemitic language, have become hugely popular among right-wing communities since they were first published at least seven years ago.
Dang. I hope someone doesn’t paste this on Twitter and get it removed.
There are now hundreds of posts on the platform which name Stonetoss as [doxxedNazi]. There are also numerous accounts on the platform that changed their profile name to “[Nazi Doxxi] is stonetoss”—and they haven’t all been suspended.
Interesting: when I search the guy’s name on the dying bird site, top results are all low-view Tweets. And only found one user with the above username. Marsman really sticking up for him!
He also had a comic called Red Panels before which was even worse. Stonetoss was a rebrand to come across as less horrifically racist.
Here is that source:
Of course they are. Twitter was bought by a thin skinned fascist and this is all expected behavior. It’s fine to post there for initial awareness, but post your info on other sites as well. Musk can’t delete threads on mastodon.
I’m absolutely surprised that PG is protecting a Nazi.
i assume thats a fake stone toss? darn its gold!
Free Speech!
I think Elon musk is putting all of his and X’s eggs in the Trump basket. He is betting on Trump winning the election, X being the mouthpiece of the new system of government, and himself, Tesla, SpaceX, powerwall, and all of his other looney ideas being the beneficiary of government contracts and favors from the new regime.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he had this in mind for a long time. That’s probably ascribing him more intelligence that he has, but it goes with his Bond villain persona. Maybe it’s why he bought Twitter at a loss.
Trump is nothing to men with that kind of wealth and power. Especially one so bad at everything he does.
Nah Elon is 100% another crazy narcissist with too much money, power, and yes men.
You speak, for someone with the username asteriskeverything, with a lot of certainty about things I’m sure you know nothing about.
However it’s nice to have your opinion.
Alright man lol
My username is a play on words, say it out loud. But I appreciate the clever call out on it lol. I’m sorry; it seems my my initial reply came off argumentive and/or challenging. I didn’t mean it like that and more just friendly healthy disagreement discussion. I understand how hard that is on the internet, especially when everyone so often just seems to try to have some “gotcha, pwn11!!” comment
I get it, we’re cool