Elsevier, everyone's favorite copyright maximalist closed-access publisher, argues that their high costs are necessary because they're the arbiter of quality.

The arbiter of quality keeps publishing LLM-written papers. Thanks for making my argument for me, Elsevier! They didn't even read it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

"In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model."

@cliffle In case it changes in the future

@Guildz @cliffle

Thanks, I too made a printout, not for public use, but for myself. Just in case I may no longer believe the story myself once they have altered the text! :-)

@the_roamer @Guildz @cliffle
Here's a digital, open-access copy from perma.cc in case #Elsevier later changes the language.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298