cliffleMar 15, 2024

Elsevier, everyone's favorite copyright maximalist closed-access publisher, argues that their high costs are necessary because they're the arbiter of quality.

The arbiter of quality keeps publishing LLM-written papers. Thanks for making my argument for me, Elsevier! They didn't even read it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

"In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model."

Show threadBen Allen
@cliffle more examples here : https://mas.to/@yogthos/112099507123072853
Yogthos (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image The occurrence of a chatbot authoring even a single sentence in an Elsevier article raises questions about the reliability and credibility of conventional peer-review processes. One could argue that such incidents highlight the need for more rigorous scrutiny and quality control measures in scientific publications. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402 and this is far from an isolated incident https://scholar.google.fr/scholar?hl=fr&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2023&q=%22certainly%2C+here+is%22+-chatgpt+-llm #machinelearning #science

mas.to
Mar 16, 2024 at 4:24pmWeb