cliffleMar 15, 2024

Elsevier, everyone's favorite copyright maximalist closed-access publisher, argues that their high costs are necessary because they're the arbiter of quality.

The arbiter of quality keeps publishing LLM-written papers. Thanks for making my argument for me, Elsevier! They didn't even read it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

"In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model."

Show threadJim Hughes ☢️Mar 15, 2024
@cliffle https://pubpeer.com/publications/F93A8D69350BC6B12AB48B132161A7 where in the authors state they uploaded the wrong version by mistake (which absolutely would have been the version that went through peer review), in a manner that looks like their apology was written by chatGPT also
PubPeer - Successful management of an Iatrogenic portal vein and hepat...

There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Successful management of an Iatrogenic portal vein and hepatic artery injury in a 4-month-old female patient: A case report and literature review (2024)

Show threadtbodt
@sideshow_jim @cliffle frankly it just looks like the apology was written by a non native english speaker
Mar 16, 2024 at 12:30amIvory for Mac
Show threadJim Hughes ☢️Mar 16, 2024
@tbodt @cliffle possibly, but based on past performance I'm not sure I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt
Show threadtbodtMar 16, 2024
@sideshow_jim @cliffle one use of chatgpt is for L2 english speakers to make their writing more "academic" or "proper" or whatever, and i'm fairly sympathetic to that
Show threadJim Hughes ☢️Mar 16, 2024
@tbodt @cliffle it's a point