Elsevier, everyone's favorite copyright maximalist closed-access publisher, argues that their high costs are necessary because they're the arbiter of quality.

The arbiter of quality keeps publishing LLM-written papers. Thanks for making my argument for me, Elsevier! They didn't even read it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043324001298

"In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model."

@cliffle hopefully they will soon use an IA to read the proposed papers and automatically reject papers written by IAs (and papers about IA, very probably! 😬)
@PH7831 @cliffle great, then the LLMs will start collaborating, how could this go wrong? 😬
@corpsmoderne @PH7831 @cliffle when LLMs both write and review the papers, at least they will technically be peer-reviewed.