Shannon VavraYesterday the Rachel Maddow Show featured my scoop on a Russian disinformation op: Fake news sites meant to look legitimate sharing allegedly "leaked" audio of 2 US officials discussing backing Russian opposition. Take watch, and read: https://www.thedailybeast.com/victoria-nuland-and-jim-obrien-impersonated-in-russian-influence-hoax
A few notes: The fake stories were ranked high in Google search before I reached out to Google about the disinformation, raising alarming questions about the future of content moderation and search algorithms when it comes to Russian disinformation leading into the 2024 election
This specific op is not an isolated incident. There are several fake news sites peddling pro-Russia narratives trying to undermine Western support for Ukraine. This new instance shows the overarching goal is to prop up Putin (in this case by undermining Russian opposition)
My reporting on this got YouTube/Google to nix the fake leaked audio. But there is more work to be done. Having action taken only when a reporter gets in touch *seems* to be a whack-a-mole approach that leaves gaps in our info ecosystem.
Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦@shanvav
Thank you for finding and reporting on it. And I hear what you're saying here. On the other hand: finding and reporting nasty stuff its originators wish to hide is a key function of the press, regardless of how whack-a-mole it has always been. A model should be found which can sustain that work.
Thank you for finding and reporting on it. And I hear what you're saying here. On the other hand: finding and reporting nasty stuff its originators wish to hide is a key function of the press, regardless of how whack-a-mole it has always been. A model should be found which can sustain that work.