Albert Einstein’s first wife Mileva (Mitza) Marić was also a brilliant physicist. They met at the Polytechnic Institute of Zurich, where she had fought for special permissions to attend and where she received higher marks than Albert. Mitza put in as much if not more work on their theories but wasn’t credited because Albert told her their works wouldn’t get published with a woman’s name on them. Many of his lecture notes are in Mitza’s handwriting, and Albert was once heard at a party saying, “I need my wife, she helps solve all of my mathematical problems.” 80% of Einstein’s famous works were published during this marriage, referred to as his “magic years.” Those magic years ended abruptly after they divorced due to his infidelity and abandonment.

Happy #womenshistorymonth

@Lana Look, I wish it were true, but almost everything in this toot is either disputed or easily proven to be factually inaccurate. Yes, she should be more acknowledged as a collaborator and Einstein was a dick to her, but her contributions were absolutely not to the degree that you claim here. (I studied history and philosophy of physics at uni.)
@Lana Her grades? Weren’t super good. Her letters? It’s not like they were suppressed, we have their papers and she doesn’t mention physics in it (he does). They talked about physics when they were together. That’s all we know. There isn’t some huge conspiracy to make this woman disappear from history - she was friendly with Marie SkƂodowska-Curie! There are enough sources to do some proper history’ing on it. Sometimes something’s not there because it didn’t happen.
@venite
If she contributed her name should be on the papers. Nobody claims the whole RelativitÀtstheorie was her idea.
@Lana
@lostgen some people do
 but that’s not relevant to this discussion. I agree that from what we know she probably talked a lot of the stuff over with him when they were in a relationship and that should be acknowledged. If it was up to the level of co-author I think we should have seen some papers that aren’t there and NOT have some papers that ARE available, like the letters. Also the was much more single authorship across the board before WW2.
@lostgen But I’m not here to try and find out her exact level of contribution. Just to point out that the original toot is wildly inaccurate. Because I don’t think it helps women if you give them a false history. There are enough women who did have their work stolen who we can reinstate and celebrate.