An opinion downvoted to hell is actually a good indication that the opinion is indeed unpopular.
An opinion downvoted to hell is actually a good indication that the opinion is indeed unpopular.
This isn’t an unpopular opinion, it doesn’t make it a right one though. For example I have no incentive to upvote this.
I think the most upvoted ones tend to be unpopular ones that are funny in some way, or ones that provoke interesting discussion (regardless of if it’s popular).
Controversial is the best way to sort for unpopular opinions that may have some validity.
Even in an unpopular opinion community it’s always the generic circle jerk popular opinions that rise to the top.
I think what people get wrong is that any statement that would get downvotes in other communities must necessarily get upvotes in this one. That’s not how it works.
“Pizza tastes better without cheese” is an unpopular opinion.
“I think we should all pee on people whenever we feel like it” is just the ramblings of an insane person. It’s unpopular sure, but it’s insane. It’s trivial to make these.
“I dislike x race” is just racist. It can also be unpopular but if it were allowed this community would just be a racist community.
Unpopular implies that the opposing position is popular - meaning that lots of people consciously hold that opinion.
For a less disgusting example, “everybody should eat bananas” is an uncommon opinion but it’s not unpopular because “nobody should eat bananas” is not a common opinion