Sealioning - Lemmy.World

‘Sealioning’ is the word that sums up why Twitter discussion is so unbearable [https://macleans.ca/culture/sealioning-is-the-word-that-sums-up-why-twitter-discussion-is-so-unbearable/] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning]

It’s a clever method of trolling. But if you come prepared and/or are willing to put some effort in, you actually can wreck them with evidence and sound arguments that shuts them completely up.

This is very satisfying.

Care to provide any evidence to support this claim? I would like to have a civil discussion with you about this. /s

Just an anecdotal account. I was expressing my own experiences and how they make me feel, for which it would be challenging and largely unnecessary to provide evidence to a random dumbass on the internet, yes?

/not s, an example

If your feelings are irrational, it’s incumbent on you as a rational person to examine them and separate emotion from fact. Since you have no facts to back up your feelings, clearly the feelings are irrational and should not be used to inform your actions or viewpoints, correct?

Not if I’m recounting a personal experience, no. Humans are not purely rational creatures, otherwise laissez faire capitalism would solve all the world’s problems.

If I wished to be purely rational, then perhaps. But personally I do not think all feelings are worth disregarding.

Would you mind providing evidence of a scenario in which it’s good to be irrational? Because it sounds like you have some level of distaste for being rational, but I’m not seeing any source to back that up.
No, that’s a frankly absurd request. What is or is not “good” is not something sourceable, it’s an entirely subjective question. What makes you think everything has some definitive source?
Excuse you, I’m being polite here and you’re calling me absurd. Can’t a person have a civil conversation without devolving into name-calling? And why haven’t you given a source? Are you unable to back up your claims, or are you unwilling to engage in rational dialogue?
I’m sorry, but if you want me to remain what you’d define as civil, you’re going to need to be reasonable, not ridiculous. You haven’t answered my question. Where does this belief all things are sourceable come from?
I have been unfailingly polite and you’re being rude, calling me ridiculous just for trying to engage in rational debate. Sources are the backbone of reasoned discussion, and if you’re unwilling to engage in that, maybe don’t make such bold claims in public.
You seem to have a proclivity for making sweeping generalizations and overarching statements. You’re not actually the God-King of the Universe, though, fyi. Regardless, I apologize for not meeting your standards for explaining my own anecdotal experiences.
Alright, I think this has gone on long enough. Thanks for playing along.
You did get me a little riled up a few posts ago. The switch to rationality vs irrationality was a good one. lol